2010
DOI: 10.1504/ijscc.2010.031156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal estimation with limited measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
69
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
5
69
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recall that the system is stable if and only if the system cost (3) is bounded. Hence, by (12), to guarantee the system stability, we only need to prove that both EOEP c and S 1 are bounded. We first prove by induction that EOEP c is bounded when (15) holds.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recall that the system is stable if and only if the system cost (3) is bounded. Hence, by (12), to guarantee the system stability, we only need to prove that both EOEP c and S 1 are bounded. We first prove by induction that EOEP c is bounded when (15) holds.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been a significant amount of research devoted to the analysis of WNCS under unreliable wireless communications [9][10][11][12]. Focusing on the state estimation problem under random measurement packet losses, Sinopoli et al first prove the existence of a critical packet reception rate above which the boundedness of the estimation error covariance can be ensured in the mean square sense [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…- [10], where it is assumed that the encoder transmits real-valued samples of the input process and that the communication is subject to a sampling frequency constraint or a transmission cost. The causal sampling and estimation policies that achieve the optimal tradeoff between the sampling frequency and the distortion have been studied for the following discrete-time processes: the i.i.d process [1]; the Gauss-Markov process [2]; the partially observed Gauss-Markov process [3]; and, the first-order autoregressive Markov process X t+1 = aX t + V t driven by an i.i.d. process {V t } with unimodal and even distribution [4] [5].…”
Section: Related Work Includes [1]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now, we proceed to show that (a)-(c) hold for all t ∈ [s, ess sup(τ i+1 )), given any s ∈ Supp(τ i ) using real induction. To verify that the condition (1) in Lemma 4 holds, we need to show that (a)-(c) hold for t = s. This is trivial since…”
Section: Lemma 3 ([2 Lemma 4])mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [12] an stochastic approach is taken to estimate the states of a Lipschitz nonlinear system with time-varying delays in the states.[13] finds a minimum data transmission rate for the convergent estimation of a process with a specific distribution. [14] introduces a two-agent scheme, namely observer and estimator, under communication constraints. The former is located by the sensor and is responsible for evaluating sensor data and transmitting the information.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%