2019
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b03872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Feature Selection for Distributed Data-Driven Process Monitoring

Abstract: Two methods are proposed in this article to address distributed data-driven process monitoring. The first method selects sensors and allocates these sensors among subsystems with the objective of optimizing the diagnostic performance of a pattern recognition method when it is implemented in a distributed configuration subject to constraints that are imposed to meet operational requirements. The second method finds the minimum number of monitoring computers required to implement the methods used for fault detec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taylor bubbles' two‐phase flow characteristics with varying the location of a single injection nozzle from the centre of the column: (A) Taylor bubble rise velocity in a 240‐mm diameter column of 360 Pa · s viscosity silicone oil, ● from electrical capacitance tomography (ECT),  calculated from Equation (), C B c = 2.27; (B) experimental and analytical lengths of Taylor bubble, ● Taylor bubble (ECT),  Taylor bubble [ 32 ] ; (C) frequency of Taylor bubbles rising in the column; and (D) liquid film thickness around large bubbles. In (A–D) a single gas injection point at different positions is used at 0.04 m/s gas superficial velocity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Taylor bubbles' two‐phase flow characteristics with varying the location of a single injection nozzle from the centre of the column: (A) Taylor bubble rise velocity in a 240‐mm diameter column of 360 Pa · s viscosity silicone oil, ● from electrical capacitance tomography (ECT),  calculated from Equation (), C B c = 2.27; (B) experimental and analytical lengths of Taylor bubble, ● Taylor bubble (ECT),  Taylor bubble [ 32 ] ; (C) frequency of Taylor bubbles rising in the column; and (D) liquid film thickness around large bubbles. In (A–D) a single gas injection point at different positions is used at 0.04 m/s gas superficial velocity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The no‐slip condition at the pipe wall may lead to a higher shear stress in the gas/liquid interface which could increase the chance of bubble coalescence, leading to increase in the length of the bubbles. Experimental bubble length was compared with the approach of Khatib and Richardson, [ 32 ] who proposed an equation to calculate the length of the Taylor bubble numerically. In their equation, they used the values of the probability density function (PDF) averaged void fraction to calculate the Taylor bubble and liquid slug length, L TB and L S , respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The solid requirement of production safety and sustainable operation keeps motivating novel approaches for effectively monitoring the operating condition of modern industrial processes 1–4 . Nowadays, the great achievements in Industry 4.0 have been popularizing wider application of data‐driven process monitoring techniques 3–5 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Ref. [37], faulty information was taken advantage of, and process decomposition methods that can lead to minimal rate of missed detection of process faults were proposed. Optimal monitoring performance can be achieved by using these methods to partition a process into groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%