2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal flight initiation distance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

17
286
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 345 publications
(305 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
17
286
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Various optimality models have been proposed to predict when an animal should flee a predator (Cooper and Frederick 2007). The most popular of these is an economic model that qualitatively predicts that prey should flee when the risk of predation is equivalent to the cost of escaping (Ydenberg and Dill 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Various optimality models have been proposed to predict when an animal should flee a predator (Cooper and Frederick 2007). The most popular of these is an economic model that qualitatively predicts that prey should flee when the risk of predation is equivalent to the cost of escaping (Ydenberg and Dill 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most popular of these is an economic model that qualitatively predicts that prey should flee when the risk of predation is equivalent to the cost of escaping (Ydenberg and Dill 1986). In contrast, other optimality models predict that escape behaviour should be flexible and adjusted based on predator search speed and prey locomotor performance (Broom and Ruxton 2005;Cooper and Frederick 2007). The key difference between these models lies in the escape cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, escape behaviour can be costly too, because by moving the prey may attract the predator, spend energy and lose resources and opportunities. Consequently, animals are supposed to escape when the fitness costs of staying exceed the costs of escaping (Ydenberg & Dill, 1986;Cooper & Frederick, 2007). For this reason, antipredator behaviour is very flexible given the variation in the actual costs-benefits relationships.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, not every individual is expected to optimize its escape strategy in the same way, both individual state and ecological context might alter the cost-benefit ratio (Cooper & Frederick, 2007). For example, relative conspicuity to predators of different individuals may affect the risk of being detected and this should affect escape decisions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%