1990
DOI: 10.1007/bf00318534
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal foraging and fitness in Columbian ground squirrels

Abstract: Optimal diets were determined for each of 109 individual Columbian ground squirrels (Spermophitus coiumbianus) at two sites in northwestern Montana. Body mass, daily activity time, and vegetation consumption rates for individuals were measured in the field, along with the average water content of vegetation at each ground squirrel colony. I also measured stomach and caecal capacity and turnover rate of plant food through the digestive tract for individuals in the laboratory to construct regressions of digestiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…accounting for whether the individual deviated in favour of monocots or dicots, was not correlated between field and enclosure (r 2 = 0.04, P > 0.20). The calculated energy cost of deviating from an optimal diet by a given amount (see Ritchie, 1990) was higher on average for deviations in favour of monocots, but significant deviations (based on a comparison of the predicted and observed diet, with its variance, using a z-test; Ritchie, 1988) in either direction resulted in dramatic reductions in growth, survival, and reproduction (Ritchie, 1990). Consequently, any deviation, regardless of sign, should result in lower energy intake and fitness.…”
Section: Foraging Ability As a Traitmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…accounting for whether the individual deviated in favour of monocots or dicots, was not correlated between field and enclosure (r 2 = 0.04, P > 0.20). The calculated energy cost of deviating from an optimal diet by a given amount (see Ritchie, 1990) was higher on average for deviations in favour of monocots, but significant deviations (based on a comparison of the predicted and observed diet, with its variance, using a z-test; Ritchie, 1988) in either direction resulted in dramatic reductions in growth, survival, and reproduction (Ritchie, 1990). Consequently, any deviation, regardless of sign, should result in lower energy intake and fitness.…”
Section: Foraging Ability As a Traitmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…I used the absolute value of this deviation as a measure of optimal foraging ability for three reasons: (1) individuals deviated from their optimal diets in favour of monocots or dicots in equal frequency (Ritchie, 1988); (2) deviating from an optimal diet appeared to reduce fitness strongly, regardless of the direction of deviation (Ritchie, 1990); (3) the absolute value of deviation was consistent across different environments but the direction of deviation was not (see Results). Deviation from an optimal diet serves as an index of the average number of foraging mistakes made by an individual each day.…”
Section: Optimal Foraging Abilitymentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations