1984
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.es.15.110184.002515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Foraging Theory: A Critical Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

34
640
1
38

Year Published

1989
1989
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,749 publications
(713 citation statements)
references
References 130 publications
34
640
1
38
Order By: Relevance
“…Originally developed for deceptive orchids, we were able to convert the findings of Lammi and Kuitunen to a system where cheating is normally absent. The remote habitat hypothesis incorporates assumptions from both optimal foraging theory (Pyke 1984) and biological market theory (Johnstone and Bshary 2008;Noe and Hammerstein 1995), which both predict that pollinators should become less discriminative when plant densities are low. This is because choice options and total nectar abundance are lower and distances between food sources increase so that the optimal foraging strategy becomes to inspect any potential resource.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Originally developed for deceptive orchids, we were able to convert the findings of Lammi and Kuitunen to a system where cheating is normally absent. The remote habitat hypothesis incorporates assumptions from both optimal foraging theory (Pyke 1984) and biological market theory (Johnstone and Bshary 2008;Noe and Hammerstein 1995), which both predict that pollinators should become less discriminative when plant densities are low. This is because choice options and total nectar abundance are lower and distances between food sources increase so that the optimal foraging strategy becomes to inspect any potential resource.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nesting site choice results from the trade‐off among the habitability of the location, its safety from predators and the distance to resources (Osborne et al., 1999, 2008; Pyke, Pulliam, & Charnov, 1977; Williams & Kremen, 2007). To limit foraging costs, individuals optimize different parameters linked to foraging such as the distance they travel (Bell, 1990; Pyke, 1984). For example, bumblebees are able to adjust their trap lines linking different flowers in few foraging bouts to reduce the duration of the nectar collection (Lihoreau et al., 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, failure-time analyses revealed that specialists enjoyed significantly lower capture rates, even in a brief 5-min bioassay. According to optimal foraging theory, resistance characters that increase the time required to subdue, handle, and assimilate prey may induce opportunistic generalist predators, like bugs, to switch to different, less costly prey that can be more efficiently dispatched (Rabb and Lawson 1957;Pyke 1984;Paradise and Stamp 1990;Olmstead and Denno 1993). Furthermore, some invertebrate predators can learn to avoid unpalatable prey and so may switch to more palatable prey before further direct encounters (Bernays 1989;Paradise and Stamp 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%