2019
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0001066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Irrigation with Perfect Weekly Forecasts versus Imperfect Seasonal Forecasts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They even did not consider weather forecast, but instead used the simple indirect method of [14]. Considering weather forecasts, the genetic algorithm was utilized to solve the couple simulation optimization: Deterministic and stochastic, to determine optimal irrigation depth and maximize seasonal net income [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They even did not consider weather forecast, but instead used the simple indirect method of [14]. Considering weather forecasts, the genetic algorithm was utilized to solve the couple simulation optimization: Deterministic and stochastic, to determine optimal irrigation depth and maximize seasonal net income [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Report generation only includes a module of report statistics, which requires the corresponding data calculation results to be produced according to the selected elements, and then displayed in the form of reports. The elements it needs to select include: region, time period, time, station type and forecast model [17][18].…”
Section: Figure 1 Overall Structure Of the Meteorological Data Analys...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimization of irrigation depths that maximize I n using WF and numerical simulation has been studied by several researchers. Some of them optimized irrigation depths corresponding to the maximal seasonal net income using a combination between genetic algorithms and the SWAP model [22][23][24]. However, they used simplified water-yield relationships in their calculations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%