2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2018.08.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal laser beam configurations for laser cutting of metal sheets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, high laser power was still required (> 500 W) [8,34]. Several studies demonstrated that the wavelength, beam angle, size, and quality play vital roles in laser-matter interactions [35][36][37].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, high laser power was still required (> 500 W) [8,34]. Several studies demonstrated that the wavelength, beam angle, size, and quality play vital roles in laser-matter interactions [35][36][37].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Value Unit wavelength 10,600 nm maximum power 5000 W power consumption (1) 35 kW focal length 9.80 mm position shifts 0.05 mm average dispersion of position (2) 0.03 mm maximum thickness of the structural steel sheet 25 mm maximum thickness of the stainless steel sheet 20 mm maximum thickness of the aluminium alloy sheet 12.7 mm working area xy 4000 × 2000 mm 2 maximum weight of workpiece 1700 kg (1) at the maximum output power; (2) on the overall cut length. (1) 35 kW focal length 9.80 mm position shifts 0.05 mm average dispersion of position (2) 0.03 mm maximum thickness of the structural steel sheet 25 mm maximum thickness of the stainless steel sheet 20 mm (1) at the maximum output power; (2) on the overall cut length.…”
Section: Featurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These different physical phenomena that govern the laser-material interaction mainly depend on chemical and physical properties of the material such as absorptivity, thermal conductivity, as well as the laser characteristics including wavelength and power density [1,2]. Melting cutting is by far the most common method for metal cutting, whereas vaporization cutting is typically used for materials with low vaporization energy and high irradiation lasers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Costa Rodrigues et al addressed the problem of using an optimal configuration of the laser beam in the case of laser cutting of metal sheets. They have shown that from the energy point of view, it is possible to optimize input factors such as wavelength, polarization and beam shape, so as to ensure good quality surfaces for workpieces made of different materials and with different thicknesses [4].…”
Section: /1mentioning
confidence: 99%