2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11332-017-0418-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal load for the muscle power profile of prone bench pull in Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu athletes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the judo and jiu-jitsu athletes, this difference was small and statistically insignificant, which may be ascribed to the way in which the competitors engage in combat which emphasizes upper-body dynamic and static strength endurance [ 44 ]. These two traits are necessary to perform particular technique-related actions (e.g., grip domination and groundwork techniques) that allow to control the opponents during attack and defense [ 45 ]. A similar decrease in the asymmetry of grip strength was also found by other researchers [ 39 , 46 , 47 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the judo and jiu-jitsu athletes, this difference was small and statistically insignificant, which may be ascribed to the way in which the competitors engage in combat which emphasizes upper-body dynamic and static strength endurance [ 44 ]. These two traits are necessary to perform particular technique-related actions (e.g., grip domination and groundwork techniques) that allow to control the opponents during attack and defense [ 45 ]. A similar decrease in the asymmetry of grip strength was also found by other researchers [ 39 , 46 , 47 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For grappling combat sports, the optimal load has been determined for the bench press throw [21] and for the prone bench pull [22]. Silva et al [21] determined the bench press throw peak power for advanced and non-advanced BJJ athletes and reported that groups did not differ concerning power achieved with 30% (advanced: 972 ± 166 W; non-advanced: 890 ± 146 W), 40% (advanced: 1015 ± 197 W; non-advanced: 931 ± 156 W), 50% (advanced: 1032 ± 173 W; non-advanced: 906 ± 126 W), and 60% of 1RM (advanced: 901 ± 176 W; non-advanced: 885 ± 135 W).…”
Section: Striking and Grappling Combat Sports Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tavares et al [22] compared these same percentages of 1RM, but using the prone bench pull exercise and indicated that mean power mean velocity, mean propulsive power and mean propulsive velocity were lower during 30% and 60% of 1RM compared with 50% and 60% of 1RM, whereas mean propulsive power with 50% of 1RM resulted in higher values than 40% of 1RM (Table 1). The polynomial adjustment indicated that the optimal load for all power and velocity-related variables was 45%.…”
Section: Striking and Grappling Combat Sports Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations