2022
DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2021.02.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Management of Patients Treated With Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery in the Era of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery and Fast-Track Protocols: A Narrative Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a review of the literature on ERAS and fast-track protocols in minimally invasive cardiac surgery, Maj et al reported that ERAS or fast-track protocols resulted in less blood transfusions, less pain, and overall lower mortality and fewer postoperative complications. 3 The few reports of fast-track pathways after minimally invasive CABG procedures have demonstrated relatively short LOS, as well, although not as short as the POD1 discharge in our study. Zaouter et al compared patients undergoing robotic pump-assisted TECAB with ERAS protocols to those undergoing open CABG with traditional perioperative care and found the hospital and ICU LOS in the TECAB group to be 4 days and 24 h shorter than the open group, respectively ( P < 0.05).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a review of the literature on ERAS and fast-track protocols in minimally invasive cardiac surgery, Maj et al reported that ERAS or fast-track protocols resulted in less blood transfusions, less pain, and overall lower mortality and fewer postoperative complications. 3 The few reports of fast-track pathways after minimally invasive CABG procedures have demonstrated relatively short LOS, as well, although not as short as the POD1 discharge in our study. Zaouter et al compared patients undergoing robotic pump-assisted TECAB with ERAS protocols to those undergoing open CABG with traditional perioperative care and found the hospital and ICU LOS in the TECAB group to be 4 days and 24 h shorter than the open group, respectively ( P < 0.05).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…Minimally invasive and robotic coronary surgery have been shown to decrease hospital LOS. [2][3][4] We developed an ultrafast-track protocol for selected patients undergoing robotic totally endoscopic coronary bypass surgery (TECAB) to be discharged on postoperative day (POD) 1. The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics of patients discharged on POD1 after robotic TECAB in our practice and compare their outcomes to patients discharged after POD1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So-called fast track programs in the cardiac surgery were about two decades ago [48]. However, only few programs focus on minimally invasive surgery and in particular on the modern minimally invasive heart valve surgery [49]. Minimally invasive approaches in heart valve surgery have been demonstrated to be safe and associated with positive health outcomes [50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, only few programs focus on minimally invasive surgery and in particular on the modern minimally invasive heart valve surgery (49). Minimally invasive approaches in heart valve surgery have been demonstrated to be safe and associated with positive health outcomes (50).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%