Optimal Monetary Policy in a Small Open Economy with Home Bias

Abstract

We analyze optimal monetary policy in a small open economy characterized by home bias in consumption. Peculiar to our framework is the application of a Ramsey-type analysis to a model of the recent open-economy New Keynesian literature. We show that home bias in consumption is a sufficient condition for inducing the monetary policymaker of an open economy to deviate from a strategy of strict markup stabilization and contemplate some (optimal) degree of exchange rate stabilization. We focus on the optimal setting of policy both in the case of firms setting prices one period in advance and in a gradual fashion subject to adjustment costs. While the first setup allows us to analytically highlight home bias as an independent source of equilibrium markup variability, the second setup allows to study the effects of future expectations on the optimal policy problem and the effect of home bias on optimal inflation volatility. The latter, in particular, is shown to be related to the degree of trade openness in a U-shaped fashion, whereas exchange rate volatility is monotonically decreasing in openness. Copyright (c) 2008 The Ohio State University.

Exchange rate flexibility under the zero lower bound

“…Note that, although the zero bound is binding in both countries, the arbitrage conditions (3) and (4) still apply. This means that (22) still holds, but with the left hand side equal to zero. Under the stationarity condition, then we have…”

Welfare Implications of Country Size in a Monetary Union

“…This particular form of the shock is meant to capture shifts in consumer preferences that can result from deeper trade integration; for example, more competition between countries increases elasticity of demand for local goods 18 .…”

The Role of Financial Market Structure and the Trade Elasticity for Monetary Policy in Open Economies

“…The value of the parameter of the quadratic adjustment cost in price setting, α, is 60, which corresponds, together with the chosen value for θ, to a parameter of about 0.75 in a Calvo style price setting or a price stickiness of about four quarters, based on the slope coefficient in the linearized pricing equations (see, e.g. Faia & Monacelli (2008)). The degree of risk aversion, σ, is considered to be 1 in the baseline parameterization (which implies log utility in consumption).…”