2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02746-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal non-invasive treatment of 1–2.5 cm radiolucent renal stones: oral dissolution therapy, shock wave lithotripsy or combined treatment—a randomized controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
1
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
10
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The reported success rates of oral dissolution therapy at 3 months range from 50 to 73% [17][18][19][20][21]. Some of the studies, however, included small-sized ureteral stones which might have passed spontaneously and thus account for a higher rate of "stone clearance" than our 61%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The reported success rates of oral dissolution therapy at 3 months range from 50 to 73% [17][18][19][20][21]. Some of the studies, however, included small-sized ureteral stones which might have passed spontaneously and thus account for a higher rate of "stone clearance" than our 61%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Other studies had lower rates of complete dissolution. A prospective trial conducted by Elbaset et al assessed the efficacy of oral dissolution therapy, SWL and a combination thereof [18]. For medium-sized renal stones from 1 to 2.5 cm, the authors reported stone-free rates of 16% at one month of oral chemolysis and 50% at 3 months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…En efecto, existen ciertos factores que juegan un rol preponderante en el desarrollo de cálculos en el tracto urinario, entre los que vale mencionar el estilo de vida, síndrome metabólico, insuficiente ingesta hídrica, bajo volumen urinario, diabetes, obesidad, cambios climáticos (Chen et al, 2019;Chung et al, 2019;Elbaset et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…En relación con el lito en sí, se ha descrito que a mayor densidad se reduce la tasa de éxito, por lo que se ha establecido el valor de 1000 U como punto de corte para predecir el resultado (Avendaño et al, 2018). Se estima oportuno mencionar que se considera que un caso se encuentra libre de cálculos cuando estos se encuentran ausentes o se verifica la presencia de fragmentos residuales que no condicionan sintomatología y cuyo tamaño es <3mm (Elbaset et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified