2016
DOI: 10.1080/19443994.2015.1101714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal operating conditions of micro- and ultra-filtration systems for produced-water purification: Taguchi method and economic investigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, operating conditions for an OiWM filtration system was optimized by deploying the full factorial design methodology, where the different operating conditions was analyzed with respect to permeate flux, fouling resistance, and TOC rejection [92]. Secondly, optimal operating conditions for MF and UF systems treating an OiWM where found in [93]. The Taguchi method was deployed to find the optimal conditions among temperature, TMP, CFV, and back pulse time.…”
Section: Operating Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, operating conditions for an OiWM filtration system was optimized by deploying the full factorial design methodology, where the different operating conditions was analyzed with respect to permeate flux, fouling resistance, and TOC rejection [92]. Secondly, optimal operating conditions for MF and UF systems treating an OiWM where found in [93]. The Taguchi method was deployed to find the optimal conditions among temperature, TMP, CFV, and back pulse time.…”
Section: Operating Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rapid flux decline demands both physical cleaning, i.e. backflushing or backpulsing, and chemical cleaning in place (CIP) to sustain the flux, with physical cleaning efficacy demonstrated in a number of studies (Li and Lee, 2009;Ebrahimi et al, 2010Ebrahimi et al, , 2012Silalahi and Leiknes, 2011;Reyhani et al, 2015;Weschenfelder et al, 2015ab). As a consequence of the large number of variables impacting on operation, reported permeability values for CMs challenged with PW or its analogues have been very wide-ranging, from below 20 to ~800 LMH/bar (Table 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, evidence from demonstration trials (Lee et al, 2005;Pedenaud et al 2011) and recent extended trials (Weschenfelder et al, 2015b) indicate very significant permeability loss over a period of several days. There have also been few studies comparing candidate CM materials; comparative studies have tended to focus on the relative performance of ceramic and polymeric membranes (Vitai et al, 2009;Reyhani and Meighani, 2015). Studies which include CM chemical cleaning efficacy (Ebrahimi et al, 2010;Weschenfelder et al, 2015b) have not encompassed long-term use of the cleaned membrane.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For some wastes the membranes have been found to be prone to fouling by waxes and asphaltenes [17]. Further good oil removal results have been obtained using an alumina membrane, with 95%-99% removals of oil [47,48]. A commercial tubular α-Al2O3 MF membrane with a pore size of 0.2 µm has been used to remove 95% of the oil from a refinery effluent, operated at 32.5 • C, leaving but 4 mg/L in the permeate [49].…”
Section: Aluminamentioning
confidence: 99%