2022
DOI: 10.1109/lcsys.2021.3130193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Path-Planning With Random Breakdowns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reverting back to the general framework from the beginning of section 2, we recall that for our models, the value function u(x, t) denotes the minimum achievable distance to the desired endpoint given that the vehicle is in position x at time t. An alternative approach to path-planning, like that used in [5,6,10,11,12,13,14], is to define the value function τ (x, t) to be the optimal remaining travel time to the desired endpoint given that the vehicle is in position x at time t. In the latter case, by definition, τ (x, t) = +∞ whenever there is no admissible path for a car which is at x at time t which can steer the car to the desired ending point before hitting the time horizon T , and thus τ (x, t) is finite if and only if there is an admissible path to the ending point in the allotted time. When there are no obstacles (or stationary obstacles), once τ (x, t) becomes finite, it will remain constant.…”
Section: Level Set Vs Optimal Control Formulation: the Time Horizon A...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Reverting back to the general framework from the beginning of section 2, we recall that for our models, the value function u(x, t) denotes the minimum achievable distance to the desired endpoint given that the vehicle is in position x at time t. An alternative approach to path-planning, like that used in [5,6,10,11,12,13,14], is to define the value function τ (x, t) to be the optimal remaining travel time to the desired endpoint given that the vehicle is in position x at time t. In the latter case, by definition, τ (x, t) = +∞ whenever there is no admissible path for a car which is at x at time t which can steer the car to the desired ending point before hitting the time horizon T , and thus τ (x, t) is finite if and only if there is an admissible path to the ending point in the allotted time. When there are no obstacles (or stationary obstacles), once τ (x, t) becomes finite, it will remain constant.…”
Section: Level Set Vs Optimal Control Formulation: the Time Horizon A...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, because we will solve these PDEs by translating them into optimization problems, it will be most convenient if we can avoid a formulation which requires boundary conditions, which would translate into difficult constraints in the optimization. Because of this, we opt for a level-set-type formulation in the vein of [7,8,9], as opposed to the control theoretic approach of [5,6,10,11,12,13,14]. These approaches are compatible, but different in philosophy.…”
Section: Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations