2018
DOI: 10.12720/sgce.8.1.59-69
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal PMU placement in a smart grid: An updated review

Abstract: In recent years, the monitoring and control of the power grid has become an essential objective to prevent system failure. The provision of measurements generated from phasor measurement units (PMUs) can play a significant role in achieving this goal. PMUs can offer synchronized measurements and dynamically measure voltages and current phasors. The estimation of the states of each bus via the installation of PMUs at each node of the bus is not necessary and is hindered by the high cost and complexity of the in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An additional deployment of PMUs on around 30-40% of the nodes, which are optimally obtained through the proposed approach, will further reduce the cyber vulnerability while improving the observability to level 2, thus increasing the total percentage of PMU buses in the network to 70-80%. These result presented in Table 1 for achieving a specific observability level with each deployment phase are consistent with other existing works [11,15,[18][19][20][21][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. Hence, one can observe the accuracy of the proposed approach for reducing the power system's cyber vulnerability, with the least possible PMUs in multiple stages.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 89%
“…An additional deployment of PMUs on around 30-40% of the nodes, which are optimally obtained through the proposed approach, will further reduce the cyber vulnerability while improving the observability to level 2, thus increasing the total percentage of PMU buses in the network to 70-80%. These result presented in Table 1 for achieving a specific observability level with each deployment phase are consistent with other existing works [11,15,[18][19][20][21][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. Hence, one can observe the accuracy of the proposed approach for reducing the power system's cyber vulnerability, with the least possible PMUs in multiple stages.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Mohanta et al [8] systematically reviewed PMUs as sensors and briefly explained formulation and techniques used in OPP. Sefid et al [2] reviewed OPP in the smart grid but discussed very few published articles related only to OPP. Misclassification of metaheuristic techniques presented is correctly presented in our paper.…”
Section: Existing Surveys In Oppmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventionally, power system quantities like voltage and current are monitored through supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) systems. The SCADA system is not sufficient for monitoring the modern power system [2][3][4] because of its low resolution, and it is not capable of giving phasor, frequency, and rate of change of frequency information. A report concerning the 14 August 2003 cascading blackout incident in the northeastern United States, published by the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC), showcased that the phase angle between western Michigan and Cleveland did increase steadily for an hour, as shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, [5,2] and [5,3,1] can be avoided as they are duplication or symmetrical to the combinations of [1,3,4], [1,3,5] and [2,5].…”
Section: Symmetry Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, it is not necessary to install PMUs at all buses, and therefore, the number of PMU installations can be reduced. This issue attracted many researchers to come up with a new method for determining the optimal placements of PMUs in power grids in previous decades [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%