2021
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3880289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Portfolio Selection With VaR and Portfolio Insurance Constraints Under Rank-Dependent Expected Utility Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…when w is inverse S-shaped) can be solved by the quantile optimization method developed recently. We refer interested readers to [10,20,11,17,19,21] for details.…”
Section: A Class Of Law-invariant Driversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…when w is inverse S-shaped) can be solved by the quantile optimization method developed recently. We refer interested readers to [10,20,11,17,19,21] for details.…”
Section: A Class Of Law-invariant Driversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally speaking, the probability measure µ in (2.3) makes the preference E a nonlinear expectation (in fact, it is a Choquet expectation), so the problem (2.4) is a challenging non-concave optimization problem. To tackle the problem (2.4), we use the so-called quantile optimization method; see [5,6,3,18,14,33,2,31,16,29,28,34,32,24] for the recent development of this method.…”
Section: Assumption 21 the Quantile Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach, coined as the "quantile formulation" by [10], was taken in Jin and Zhou [9] to solve for the first time a behavioral portfolio selection problem with probability distortion and S-shaped utility functions. It is subsequently employed to solve various non-expected utility portfolio selection problems, such as in [10,18,17,19,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%