2013 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/icc.2013.6655539
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal power allocation policy over two identical Gilbert-Elliott channels

Abstract: We study the fundamental problem of optimal power allocation over two identical Gilbert-Elliott (Binary Markov) communication channels. Our goal is to maximize the expected discounted number of bits transmitted over an infinite time span by judiciously choosing one of the four actions for each time slot: 1) allocating power equally to both channels, 2) allocating all the power to channel 1, 3) allocating all the power to channel 2, and 4) allocating no power to any of the channels. As the channel state is unkn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [9], the authors study the problem of choosing a transmitting strategy from two choices emphasizing the case when the channel transition probabilities are unknown. The work in [10] and [11] is most relevant to the work in this paper, the differences between these three are as follows: [10] addresses power allocation problem in the context of two identical channels and three allocation strategies: betting on channel 1, betting on channel 2 and using both channels, whilst [11] added one more action of using none of the channels and introduced penalty caused by transmission on a bad channel. The spirit of this paper is similar to those in [10] and [11], but addresses a more challenging setting involving N identical channels(N ≥ 3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [9], the authors study the problem of choosing a transmitting strategy from two choices emphasizing the case when the channel transition probabilities are unknown. The work in [10] and [11] is most relevant to the work in this paper, the differences between these three are as follows: [10] addresses power allocation problem in the context of two identical channels and three allocation strategies: betting on channel 1, betting on channel 2 and using both channels, whilst [11] added one more action of using none of the channels and introduced penalty caused by transmission on a bad channel. The spirit of this paper is similar to those in [10] and [11], but addresses a more challenging setting involving N identical channels(N ≥ 3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work in [10] and [11] is most relevant to the work in this paper, the differences between these three are as follows: [10] addresses power allocation problem in the context of two identical channels and three allocation strategies: betting on channel 1, betting on channel 2 and using both channels, whilst [11] added one more action of using none of the channels and introduced penalty caused by transmission on a bad channel. The spirit of this paper is similar to those in [10] and [11], but addresses a more challenging setting involving N identical channels(N ≥ 3). When N is large, the power allocation decisions becomes much more complicated, and it is more difficult to derive and express the optimal policy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…by solving the value function Equation (18). Else, if λ 0 < ρ 1 < λ 1 < ρ 2 , as is shown in Figure 4e, then we have a i = C for s i−1 = 0 where (18), and a i = O is the optimal action for s i−1 = 1 where…”
Section: Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous studies [17][18][19], the time-varying rain attenuation at the Ka-band channel is used to model to a two-state Gilbert-Elliot (GE) channel, and several works have focused on the optimal data transmission policy. In [20], three data transmission actions were proposed to be chosen at the beginning of each time slot to maximize the expected long-term throughput.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%