2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2014.03.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal power flow using Teaching-Learning-Based Optimization technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
117
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 225 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
117
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remarkably, the average computational time of one iteration for this case is 1.83 s. The optimal adjustments of control variables and optimal values of cost minimization are tabulated in Table 6. For further validation, the results obtained with Jaya algorithm are compared with those of TLBO [28], GSA [34], BBO [34], PSO [35], DE [36], and GWO [36], as shown in Table 7. Jaya algorithm obviously obtained a more superior solution.…”
Section: Ieee 118-bus Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Remarkably, the average computational time of one iteration for this case is 1.83 s. The optimal adjustments of control variables and optimal values of cost minimization are tabulated in Table 6. For further validation, the results obtained with Jaya algorithm are compared with those of TLBO [28], GSA [34], BBO [34], PSO [35], DE [36], and GWO [36], as shown in Table 7. Jaya algorithm obviously obtained a more superior solution.…”
Section: Ieee 118-bus Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teaching-Learning-Based Optimization (TLBO) [28] 129,682.844 NA Gravitational Search Algorithm (GSA) [34] 129,565 76.19 Biogeography-Based Optimisation (BBO) [34] 129,686 78.14 Particle Swarm Optimization(PSO) [35] 130,288.21 NA Differential Evolution (DE) [36] 129,582 79.41 Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO) [36] 129,720 79.58…”
Section: Algorithm Fuel Cost ($/H) Real Power Losses (Mw)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, feasibility preserving methods are highly time-consuming. To use a penalty function method, a penalty factor associated with each violated constraint is added to the objective function in order to penalize infeasible solutions [47]. Therefore, the optimum is found when all the constraints are respected and the objective function is minimized.…”
Section: Particle Swarm Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transformers Connected in Parallel (TCP) with tap-changers are used for controlling power flows through voltage regulation in power grids and ensuring that the load voltage remains within an admissible range; therefore, most methods for coordinating TCP with taps are mainly designed to regulate voltage amplitude [6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. In [6,7], tap-changers of TCP are mainly used for reactive power control with the aim of minimizing power losses and therefore the construction features of transformers are neglected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [6,7], tap-changers of TCP are mainly used for reactive power control with the aim of minimizing power losses and therefore the construction features of transformers are neglected. In [8,9], TCP with tap-changers are used in the context of optimal power flow. In this case, the authors objective is to find the optimal tap positions with the aim of improving stability and minimizing generation fuel cost, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%