2022
DOI: 10.3390/math10030346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Reactive Power Dispatch Using a Chaotic Turbulent Flow of Water-Based Optimization Algorithm

Abstract: In this study, an optimization algorithm called chaotic turbulent flow of water-based optimization (CTFWO) algorithm is proposed to find the optimal solution for the optimal reactive power dispatch (ORPD) problem. The ORPD is formulated as a complicated, mixed-integer nonlinear optimization problem, comprising control variables which are discrete and continuous. The CTFWO algorithm is used to minimize voltage deviation (VD) and real power loss (P_loss) for IEEE 30-bus and IEEE 57-bus power systems. These goals… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This work considers a medium-scale IEEE 57-test system portrayed in Figure 15, to assess the scalability of the suggested methods. This system has a total generation capacity of 1975.9 MW and is made up of 80 transmission lines, containing 25 control variables including 7 generators, 3 shunt VAR compensators, and 15 transformers [6,16,34]. Furthermore, the system is restricted as follows: the voltage magnitude range for all buses is 0.9 pu to 1.1 pu.…”
Section: Methods Balance Of Active Power Balance Of Reactive Powermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This work considers a medium-scale IEEE 57-test system portrayed in Figure 15, to assess the scalability of the suggested methods. This system has a total generation capacity of 1975.9 MW and is made up of 80 transmission lines, containing 25 control variables including 7 generators, 3 shunt VAR compensators, and 15 transformers [6,16,34]. Furthermore, the system is restricted as follows: the voltage magnitude range for all buses is 0.9 pu to 1.1 pu.…”
Section: Methods Balance Of Active Power Balance Of Reactive Powermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2 depicts the IEEE 30-bus test system with 19 control variables including 6 generators, 4 tap changing transformer settings, 9 shunt VAR compensators, 41 branches (37 lines and 4 tap changing transformers), and the total real and reactive power demands are 238.4 MW and 126.2 MVAR, respectively. The exact details of lines and buses for the IEEE-30 bus system are described in [16,34]. Furthermore, in this research, the system is restricted as follows: the magnitude range of all buses' voltages is 0.95 pu to 1.1 pu.…”
Section: Ieee 30-bus Test Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many modern population based meta-heuristic and nature inspired techniques have been used to resolve this process. Several of the famous optimizations algorithms that attempted this problem include: Genetic Algorithm(GA), 4 Simulated Annealing(SA), 5,6 Differential Evolution(DE), 7,8 Moth Swarm Optimization Algorithm(MSA), 9 Spider Monkey Optimization(SMO), 10 Grey Wolf Optimizer(GWO), 11 Fire Fly Algo-rithm(FFA), 12,13 Harmony Search Algorithm(HSA), 14,15 Spiral Optimization Algorithm(SOA), 16 Artificial Bee Colony(ABC), 17,18 Bacterial Foraging Algorithm (BFA), 19 Particle swarm Optimization(PSO), 20,21 β-hill climbing optimization, 22 Mine Blast Algorithm(MBA), 23 Flower Pollination Algorithm(FPA), 24 Chaotic Turbulent Flow of Water Based Optimization Algorithm(CTFWO), 25 and Coyote Optimization Algorithm(COA). 26 Table 1 addresses the contributions of.…”
Section: Tionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The (ORPD) problem, as a sub-problem of OPF, has significant effects on providing reliability and economical performance [37]. A new optimization algorithm which has been named Turbulent Flow Water Based Optimization Algorithm (CTFWO) is used to solve the OPRD which is a complex mixed integer nonlinear optimization problem that includes discrete and continuous control variables (40). The Benchmark table was utilized by Kumar et al (41), which could be an enormous table with awfully expansive numbers that need much time and calculations to run for OPRD while the improved TM, employs OAs that have lower numbers and need lower time and calculations to run for the ORPD problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%