1993
DOI: 10.1109/71.246078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal routing algorithm and the diameter of the cube-connected cycles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many communication algorithms require asymptotically the same time on the cube-connected cycle as on the binary hypercube. Single node broadcastÂgather run in O(log N ) steps, while all other patterns (total exchange, multinode broadcast, and single node scatter) take O(N) steps [210]. Reif and Valiant have given an optimal randomized sorting algorithm on the cube-connected cycle [270], and Leighton has shown how to sort on the butterfly in O(log N ) time on the butterfly with constant queues.…”
Section: Hypercubic and Related Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many communication algorithms require asymptotically the same time on the cube-connected cycle as on the binary hypercube. Single node broadcastÂgather run in O(log N ) steps, while all other patterns (total exchange, multinode broadcast, and single node scatter) take O(N) steps [210]. Reif and Valiant have given an optimal randomized sorting algorithm on the cube-connected cycle [270], and Leighton has shown how to sort on the butterfly in O(log N ) time on the butterfly with constant queues.…”
Section: Hypercubic and Related Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each node of a ring is connected in one dimension of the Hypercube. The degree is constant and equal to 3 [3]. The definition of CCC can be generalized to different lengths of cycles of the size of the cube.…”
Section: The Cube Connected Cycle CCC Topologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3,2) de bruijn graph where d = 3 and k = 2. This graph represents 3 2 nodes • Various de Bruijn networks:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is instructive to compare the diameter Qg À Q, derived above, with the diameter PXSg À P of a CCC network of the same size [21]. The slightly larger diameter of the PRC ring is due to the unidirectional links and lower node degree (CCC has node in/out-degree of 3).…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%