2022
DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2021.3123790
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Secondary Control to Suppress Voltage Fluctuations in an HVDC-Linked Wind Farm Grid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the proposed strategy implies negligible impacts on the WT's drivetrain shaft. Future work needs to investigate the cooperation of this strategy with the offshore AC grid voltage controller [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the proposed strategy implies negligible impacts on the WT's drivetrain shaft. Future work needs to investigate the cooperation of this strategy with the offshore AC grid voltage controller [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [58], MPC-based coordination was achieved in a distributed manner. Moreover, Figure 2b shows an optimal real-time strategy for secondary voltage control (SVC) of HVDC-linked OWFs, with consideration of the communication time delays between the central and local controllers [59]. The optimal coordination between the HVDC system and OWFs reduced voltage fluctuations at the PCC, POC, and the terminals of OWFs in the offshore grid.…”
Section: Frequency Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Case 3, a centralized optimization problem was formulated to determine the decentralized control gains. Specifically, the centralized H∞ control gains were first obtained from the solution to the optimization problem and, consequently, the decentralized controller for grid k was implemented by arbitrarily setting the off-diagonal elements of the centralized gains to zero, apart from the elements corresponding to YEk and YPj for j ≠ k, shown in (15). This leads the decentralized control for Case 3 to become non-optimal.…”
Section: A Test System and Simulation Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in general, MPC is computationally intensive, because an optimization problem for MPC needs to be solved directly at every time step. MPC is also likely to cause oscillatory and even unstable operation of MTDC-linked grids due to communication time delays and model parameter uncertainty [15]. Therefore, the optimal FR strategies discussed in [12]- [14] need to be further analyzed under practical conditions of MTDC systems, for example, with regard to hybrid converters, communications links, and system parameter estimates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%