2019
DOI: 10.3390/rs11050514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Segmentation Scale Parameter, Feature Subset and Classification Algorithm for Geographic Object-Based Crop Recognition Using Multisource Satellite Imagery

Abstract: Geographic object-based image analysis (GEOBIA) has been widely used in the remote sensing of agricultural crops. However, issues related to image segmentation, data redundancy and performance of different classification algorithms with GEOBIA have not been properly addressed in previous studies, thereby compromising the accuracy of subsequent thematic products. It is in this regard that the current study investigates the optimal scale parameter (SP) in multi-resolution segmentation, feature subset, and classi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(92 reference statements)
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An example of this can be seen in Figure 12c, where the supervised approach generated segments with well-defined boundaries and a better geometric match to the LPIS parcels than the two unsupervised Bayesian approaches in Figure 12a,b, respectively. The adaptability of supervised segmentation optimization was also asserted by Yang et al [39] after testing a supervised optimization approach based on the information gain ratio and an unsupervised optimization approach based on MI and WV as was proposed by Espindola et al [33]. The major defect of any supervised optimization method is the reliance on reference data, which are tedious to obtain [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…An example of this can be seen in Figure 12c, where the supervised approach generated segments with well-defined boundaries and a better geometric match to the LPIS parcels than the two unsupervised Bayesian approaches in Figure 12a,b, respectively. The adaptability of supervised segmentation optimization was also asserted by Yang et al [39] after testing a supervised optimization approach based on the information gain ratio and an unsupervised optimization approach based on MI and WV as was proposed by Espindola et al [33]. The major defect of any supervised optimization method is the reliance on reference data, which are tedious to obtain [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For the first approach, which we termed default optimization, we optimized the scale parameter while keeping the shape and compactness parameters constant at their default, as is mostly done in the literature [20,31,[37][38][39][43][44][45]. Shape was kept at 0.1, and compactness was kept at 0.5.…”
Section: Unsupervised Segmentation Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The automated scale parameter approach, as an unsupervised method of segmentation accuracy assessment [42][43][44], also provides a more objective basis on which to set SP, a key factor for image object classification accuracy [45,46]. To further improve the process of selecting optimal SP values, an enhancement to ESP software was released as ESP2, an e-Cognition plug-in [36].…”
Section: The Importance Of Image Segmentation Quality As Prerequisitementioning
confidence: 99%