2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jspi.2007.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal step-stress test under type I progressive group-censoring with random removals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The optimal step-stress test under progressive type-I censoring, assuming exponential lifetime distribution was considered by [11]. For more recent research on step-stress ALTs, see [12] [13] [14] [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimal step-stress test under progressive type-I censoring, assuming exponential lifetime distribution was considered by [11]. For more recent research on step-stress ALTs, see [12] [13] [14] [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…on data collection. Therefore, some incomplete data could be collected, such as progressive censoring data (see Balakrishnan and Aggarwala [3], Aggarwala [1], Hong et al [6], Wu et al [17], Wu et al [18], Sanjel and Balakrishnan [14], Lee et al [11], and Wu [16]). For step-stress accelerated life-testing data, Lee et al [10] assessed the lifetime performance index of exponential products In this paper, we consider the progressive type I interval censoring case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this set-up, the specification of the inspection points is crucial. The most common assumption is that they coincide with the change of stress level time points (Gouno [14], Xiong and Ji [42], Tsai et al [34], Wu et al [40], Wang et al [39]). More intermediate inspection points have been also considered in the literature, e.g., by Seo and Yum [32] for equally spaced or equal probability inspection intervals, and by Lee and Pan [27] for inspection intervals of fixed length.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of interval sampling, the lifetime distributions usually assumed are the exponential (Bai et al [4], Gouno [14], Wu et al [40]) and the Weibull (Lee and Pan [27]), while the Rayleigh and the geometric distributions have also been considered in Tsai et al [34] and Wang et al [39], respectively. Regarding censoring, type-I censoring has been treated by Seo and Yum [32] and Xiong and Ji [42] while type-I progressive censoring by Wu et al [40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%