2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.spa.2014.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal stopping under nonlinear expectation

Abstract: Let X be a bounded càdlàg process with positive jumps defined on the canonical space of continuous paths. We consider the problem of optimal stopping the process X under a nonlinear expectation operator E defined as the supremum of expectations over a weakly compact family of nondominated measures. We introduce the corresponding nonlinear Snell envelope. Our main objective is to extend the Snell envelope characterization to the present context. Namely, we prove that the nonlinear Snell envelope is an E−superma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
106
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
106
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We next recall the Snell envelop characterization of the optimal stopping problem under nonlinear expectation, see Theorem 3.5 in Ekren, Touzi & Zhang [9].…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We next recall the Snell envelop characterization of the optimal stopping problem under nonlinear expectation, see Theorem 3.5 in Ekren, Touzi & Zhang [9].…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following lemma shows that the function u satisfies a dynamic programming principle (see, for example, Lemma 4.1 of [7] for a proof).…”
Section: Example Of a Duality Results For An American Optionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to a subsequence, {P n } n∈N has a limit P in the weakly compact probability set P. Then as n → ∞ in (1.4), we can deduce Z 0 = E P [Z ν ] and thus (1.3) by leveraging the continuity estimates (4.2), (4.5) of Z as well as a similar argument to the one used in the proof of [19,Theorem 3.3] that replaces ν n 's with a sequence of quasi-continuous random variables decreasing sequence to ν.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%