2020
DOI: 10.2514/1.g005352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Tuning of Adaptive Augmenting Controller for Launch Vehicles in Atmospheric Flight

Abstract: to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions www.aiaa.org/randp.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gains for lateral, z-axis control are as small as one or two orders of magnitude lower than K P θ or K D θ in order to satisfy the constraints on maximum drift and drift-rate in Table 3 without hindering the attitude error performance [24].…”
Section: Baseline Controller a Control System Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Gains for lateral, z-axis control are as small as one or two orders of magnitude lower than K P θ or K D θ in order to satisfy the constraints on maximum drift and drift-rate in Table 3 without hindering the attitude error performance [24].…”
Section: Baseline Controller a Control System Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among many applications this approach has proved effective for tuning the longitudinal control loop of a fixed wing aircraft [20], for the attitude stabilization of a quad-rotor [21], and the synthesis of a robust servomechanism linear quadratic regulator on a fixedwing UAV [22]. A GA-based tuning, where a robust design optimization (RDO) problem [23] is solved, has been recently presented for improving the performance of an adaptive architecture for the attitude control of LVs [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GA shows superior performance in forward flight among a number of EA algorithms, the performances of which are compared in the optimized tuning of a PID-based FCS for a medium-scale rotorcraft [39]. GA effectiveness for control tuning has been also exploited by the authors for the attitude control of a launch vehicle in atmospheric flight [40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The determination of the parameters of the notch filter is the key to the design, and the location of the zero point of the notch filter; i.e., the frequency center, can be determined after the transfer function of the elastic launch vehicle is determined with sufficient accuracy in the model [4,5]. In order to solve the low-frequency, dense-frequency elastic vibration modes appearing in the launch vehicle, some scholars adopted the method of attitude control of the flexible launch vehicle by adaptive control of the adaptive notch, and the adaptive controller of the adaptive notch filter successfully stabilized the uncertain and time-varying equations of the launch vehicle model dynamics through thrust vector control [6]. Another scholar designed a bending mode filter for the whole system, which had a better filtering function for low-frequency, dense-frequency modes, and achieved good control results [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cui Naigang et al applied an interference compensation control loop and active load reduction control loop based on the dilated state observer to the adaptive gain adjustment structure, and performed a simulation analysis of the pitch channel control [22]. To enhance the robustness to changes in elastic modal parameters, Domenico Trotta integrated the AAC control architecture with adaptive notch filters and proposed two novel and effective tuning methods for adaptively enhanced control systems, which were optimized by robust design and solved by genetic algorithms to achieve continuous improvement in the performance and robustness of standard launch vehicle single-axis attitude controllers in atmospheric flight [6,23]. Diego Navarro designed two adaptive augmentation control laws using a robust control design (structured H∞ control) as a baseline controller to improve the robust performance of AAC control, while analyzing the effect of the adaptive action on the classical stability margin, and validated this analysis using nonlinear time-domain stability margin evaluation techniques [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%