2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/iros.2016.7759815
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Visual Servoing for differentially flat underactuated systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed optimization procedure leads to computational time constraints that do not allow to constantly re-optimize the whole path while following it, penalizing the vehicle to obtain even more better tracking performance. Our work builds on a part of the problem formulation given in [14], but our solution presents significant differences: (i) the whole problem is decoupled and split into two optimization problems; (ii) The formulation of the target re-projection error assumes a slightly different form, by enabling to scale the different error components; (iii) the NMPC explicitly takes into account two dynamic effects and the low-level controller that runs on the UAV. The coupling between perception and planning has also been addressed in [2], where an UAV has to simultaneously localize itself with respect to a gap and pass trough it.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The proposed optimization procedure leads to computational time constraints that do not allow to constantly re-optimize the whole path while following it, penalizing the vehicle to obtain even more better tracking performance. Our work builds on a part of the problem formulation given in [14], but our solution presents significant differences: (i) the whole problem is decoupled and split into two optimization problems; (ii) The formulation of the target re-projection error assumes a slightly different form, by enabling to scale the different error components; (iii) the NMPC explicitly takes into account two dynamic effects and the low-level controller that runs on the UAV. The coupling between perception and planning has also been addressed in [2], where an UAV has to simultaneously localize itself with respect to a gap and pass trough it.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all the above mentioned work, except for [14], there is no guarantee that the target is constantly kept in the camera field of view because they don't directly take into account the vehicle dynamics.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [15], a hybrid visual servoing technique for differentially flat systems was presented. A polynomial parameterization of the flat outputs of the system was required, and due to the computational load required by the designed optimization framework, an optimal trajectory was computed in advance and never replanned.…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UAV frames represent trajectory points along the prediction horizon T : the blue frames represent the refined portion of the lattice, while the red ones correspond to the coarser rest of trajectory. does not allow real-time computation, thus making NMPC impractical in real-world applications 1 [19] [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%