2020
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa3262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal void finders in weak lensing maps

Abstract: Cosmic voids are a key component of the large-scale structure that contain a plethora of cosmological information. Typically, voids are identified from the underlying galaxy distribution, which is a biased tracer of the total matter field. Previous works have shown that 2D voids identified in weak lensing maps – weak lensing voids – correspond better to true underdense regions along the line of sight. In this work, we study how the properties of weak lensing voids depend on the choice of void finder, by adapti… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The error bars on the QCDM tangential shear profiles from the two algorithms are also similar in size, which suggests that both algorithms may offer similar constraining power, consistent with ref. [84] which finds roughly similar tangential shear signal-to-noise ratios between the two algorithms. The relative differences between the cvG models and their QCDM counterpart peak at the minimum of the profile, with a 10% difference for cvG with β 3 = 10 −6 , roughly the same as the relative difference found for tunnels in the same size range (which is the tunnel category for ν > 1).…”
Section: Watershedmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The error bars on the QCDM tangential shear profiles from the two algorithms are also similar in size, which suggests that both algorithms may offer similar constraining power, consistent with ref. [84] which finds roughly similar tangential shear signal-to-noise ratios between the two algorithms. The relative differences between the cvG models and their QCDM counterpart peak at the minimum of the profile, with a 10% difference for cvG with β 3 = 10 −6 , roughly the same as the relative difference found for tunnels in the same size range (which is the tunnel category for ν > 1).…”
Section: Watershedmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In the final section we focus on the study of weak-lensing statistics. We start by analysing the lensing convergence field (κ) which can be used together with the matter power spectrum and bispectrum to circumvent the dependence on tracer bias (e.g., [82]), and end with an analysis of the abundances and tangential shear profiles of voids identified from WL maps [83,84].…”
Section: Weak Lensing Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations