2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11240-019-01583-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimisation of regeneration parameters improves transformation efficiency of recalcitrant tomato

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results clearly indicated the significant role of hormonal composition and genotypes on shoot induction and regeneration. Similar effects of these two variables on shoot regeneration were also reported for several tomato cultivars such as Micro-Tom ( Pino et al, 2010;Cruz-Mendívil et al, 2011), Rio Grande (Khoudi et al, 2009;Prihatna et al, 2019), and Pusa Ruby (Sarker et al, 2009). Several other regeneration studies from leaves and cotyledons of tomato cultivars such as Castle Rack (Devi et al, 2008), Pusa Uphar (Kaur and Bansal, 2010), Smart 18 (Kalyani and Rao, 2014), and PKM-1 (Sherkar and Chavan, 2014) have resulted in 65-94% shoot regeneration capacity with different hormonal combinations.…”
Section: Optimization Of Tissue Culture and Regeneration Parameters Osupporting
confidence: 58%
“…These results clearly indicated the significant role of hormonal composition and genotypes on shoot induction and regeneration. Similar effects of these two variables on shoot regeneration were also reported for several tomato cultivars such as Micro-Tom ( Pino et al, 2010;Cruz-Mendívil et al, 2011), Rio Grande (Khoudi et al, 2009;Prihatna et al, 2019), and Pusa Ruby (Sarker et al, 2009). Several other regeneration studies from leaves and cotyledons of tomato cultivars such as Castle Rack (Devi et al, 2008), Pusa Uphar (Kaur and Bansal, 2010), Smart 18 (Kalyani and Rao, 2014), and PKM-1 (Sherkar and Chavan, 2014) have resulted in 65-94% shoot regeneration capacity with different hormonal combinations.…”
Section: Optimization Of Tissue Culture and Regeneration Parameters Osupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Cytokinins in plants stimulate cell division, bud initiation, and proliferation ( Van Staden et al, 2008 ). In vitro regeneration of tomato has been significantly affected by the explants, genotypes, and PGR concentrations and combinations used in the culture medium ( Alatar et al, 2017 , Prihatna et al, 2019 , Saeed et al, 2019 , Vinoth et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among various concentrations of hygromycin, 20 mg l −1 was observed as the most suitable concentration for the successful recovery of transformants of tomato ( Koul et al, 2014 , Li et al, 2013 ). Diverse hygromycin concentrations have been successfully applied as a selection agent to recover transgenic plants in tomato ( Koul et al, 2014 , Prihatna et al, 2019 , Gadir et al, 2018 ). Pre-culturing of explants was successfully enhanced the transformation efficiency in different explants of several tomato genotypes ( Koul et al, 2014 , Shah et al, 2016 , Gadir et al, 2018 , Stavridou et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…F. hindsii is a model species for citrus studies and has complete genome sequencing and assembly [ 18 ]. However, due to the limitation of genotype dependence, the transformation efficiency of F. hindsii is much lower than that of other crops, which increases the workload and further hinders research on citrus genetics and functional genomics [ 35 , 36 ]. In this study, we confirmed that the CRISPR/Cas9 system with pK7WG2D as the binary vector can efficiently edit the genome of F. hindsii , while the pMDC32 vector was not suitable for F. hindsii ( Figs 2 and 3 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%