2013
DOI: 10.1007/s12649-013-9196-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimisation of the construction and demolition waste management facilities location in Cantabria (Spain) under economical and environmental criteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One conclusion was that such investment is risky due to low costs for the landfilling of C&D waste and the use of quarry materials in combination with high investment costs for the recycling facility. Galan et al (2013) optimized localizations for waste recycling facilities due to transportation distances and total costs in the region of Cantabria in Spain. Recycling facilities with a capacity of 50 000e300 000 tons was evaluated.…”
Section: Recycling At Facilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…One conclusion was that such investment is risky due to low costs for the landfilling of C&D waste and the use of quarry materials in combination with high investment costs for the recycling facility. Galan et al (2013) optimized localizations for waste recycling facilities due to transportation distances and total costs in the region of Cantabria in Spain. Recycling facilities with a capacity of 50 000e300 000 tons was evaluated.…”
Section: Recycling At Facilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All material is currently landfilled. An optimal combination of recycling facilities, according to Galan et al (2013), was three processing plants or one processing plant combined with three transfer stations. In the suggested scenarios, transport distances for C&D waste could be reduced by 35% (Galan et al, 2013).…”
Section: Recycling At Facilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Construction solid waste (CSW) activities are a major source of waste; their share varies between 13% and 40% of the total solid waste generated, depending on the country. It is estimated that about 30%~46% of CSW generated is recycled in the world [10][11]. According to the literature [12], in China, 2 billion tons of CSW is produced each year, accounting for more than 30% of the municipal solid waste.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GA / AIS Eskandarpour et al [191] 2013 (lin) exact / heur. LINGO, Gurobi / VNS Fahimnia et al [140] 2013 exact AMPL + CPLEX Galan et al [283] 2013 exact GAMS Golebiewski et al [236] 2013 heur. GA Lee et al [301] 2013 exact GAMS zceylan and Paksoy [159] 2013 exact GAMS + CPLEX zceylan and Paksoy [228] 2013 exact GAMS + CPLEX zceylan and Paksoy [291] 2013 exact GAMS + BARON zkr and Baslgl [212] 2013 exact GAMS + BARON Phuc et al [201] 2013 exact MATLAB Ramezani et al [182] 2013 unclear Ramezani et al [183] 2013 exact GAMS + CPLEX Samanlioglu [101] 2013 exact CPLEX Shokohyar and Mansour [135] 2013 heur.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%