2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimising drone flight planning for measuring horticultural tree crop structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
53
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, this upper end of the image overlap range is adopted in cases where a high level of accuracy is required [56,57,59], while the lowest overlaps, for rapid observation with low accuracy requirements, should not be less than 55% [60]. Some studies have also found that interactions between flight collection variables, including flight altitude, image overlap, flying direction, speed and solar elevation affect UAS data quality and the subsequent processing results, emphasizing the need for flight planning optimization [61].…”
Section: Camera Settings and Uas Control Softwarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, this upper end of the image overlap range is adopted in cases where a high level of accuracy is required [56,57,59], while the lowest overlaps, for rapid observation with low accuracy requirements, should not be less than 55% [60]. Some studies have also found that interactions between flight collection variables, including flight altitude, image overlap, flying direction, speed and solar elevation affect UAS data quality and the subsequent processing results, emphasizing the need for flight planning optimization [61].…”
Section: Camera Settings and Uas Control Softwarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many other applications (e.g., ecological modeling and forestry management) require accurate estimation of tree parameters [40]. Similarly, Tu et al [41] mention the need for accurate 3D models in horticulture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decreasing the GSD would imply (a combination of) flying lower, slower, with an increased sensor size and/or an increased focal length, further restricting the drone platform and sensor type choices. Either way, working with smaller GSDs lengthens the processing time for a given field size because of the larger number of pixels [46]. Moreover, as the trees are not static due to wind (especially so for the fine branches at the top) and the drone flight itself can cause additional wind circulation (depending on the platform type and flight height), there will be a limit on the GSD and the dense point matching that can be achieved under given meteorological conditions.…”
Section: Limitations and Recommendations For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%