2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2015.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimising filtering parameters for a 3D motion analysis system

Abstract: In the analysis of movement data it is common practice to use a low-pass filter in order to reduce measurement noise. However, the choice of a cut-off frequency is typically rather arbitrary. The aim of the present study was to evaluate a new method to find the optimal cut-off frequency for filtering kinematic data. In particular, we propose to use rigid marker clusters to determine the dynamic precision of a given 3D motion analysis system, and to use this precision as criterion to find the optimal cut-off fr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After the cross-correlation, the MVN data were low-pass filtered with a zero-phase 10th order Butterworth filter using a cut-off frequency of 8 Hz. According to Schreven et al [33], the optimal cut-off frequency for filtering human motion data is about 8 Hz. By means of the two filters (i.e., the one during exporting and the one in Matlab), we ensured that the signal was not contaminated with high-frequency sensor noise, while still capturing rapid limb motions of the participant.…”
Section: Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the cross-correlation, the MVN data were low-pass filtered with a zero-phase 10th order Butterworth filter using a cut-off frequency of 8 Hz. According to Schreven et al [33], the optimal cut-off frequency for filtering human motion data is about 8 Hz. By means of the two filters (i.e., the one during exporting and the one in Matlab), we ensured that the signal was not contaminated with high-frequency sensor noise, while still capturing rapid limb motions of the participant.…”
Section: Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While no clear trend could be derived for the best ranked combinations of GRF data, most of the best ranked combinations of jerk data were filtered. To our knowledge, this analysis was the first that investigated whether a filter (using an optimal filter cut-off frequency) affects the prediction accuracy of GRF data in human gait (Schreven et al, 2015). The present findings suggest that machine-learning classification should use filtered GRF data.…”
Section: Grf Filteringmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…It is possible to expand this technique towards multiple LED tracking for a full 3D analysis. This would simplify video-based 3D motion and coordination analysis [34] to understand the relationship between body actions and acceleration. In combination with augmented reality tools automatic LED tracking may become a powerful interactive method to optimize interventions in stroke training.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%