2017
DOI: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2017.0954
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimising the thermal environment and the ampacity of underground power cables using the gravitational search algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…lines at the crossing area are 1.1 m and 0.8 m, respectively. The value of 1.1 m corresponds to the optimal width of the cable bedding for the case of laying HV single-core cables in flat formation from [21], which is also in line with the values from [14]. The cable bedding height of 0.8 m is obtained by considering the height of the bedding-part below the lower cable line equals 0.1 m, and the height of the bedding-part above the upper cable line equals 0.4 m in relation to the axes of the cables; which is in accordance with [21] and [14].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…lines at the crossing area are 1.1 m and 0.8 m, respectively. The value of 1.1 m corresponds to the optimal width of the cable bedding for the case of laying HV single-core cables in flat formation from [21], which is also in line with the values from [14]. The cable bedding height of 0.8 m is obtained by considering the height of the bedding-part below the lower cable line equals 0.1 m, and the height of the bedding-part above the upper cable line equals 0.4 m in relation to the axes of the cables; which is in accordance with [21] and [14].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The value of 1.1 m corresponds to the optimal width of the cable bedding for the case of laying HV single-core cables in flat formation from [21], which is also in line with the values from [14]. The cable bedding height of 0.8 m is obtained by considering the height of the bedding-part below the lower cable line equals 0.1 m, and the height of the bedding-part above the upper cable line equals 0.4 m in relation to the axes of the cables; which is in accordance with [21] and [14]. Accordingly, the height of the bedding-part between the two cable lines is 0.3 m. For the first and second cable lines outside the cable crossing, the optimal height of their cable beddings is 0.5 m, while the ratio between the heights of the bedding-parts below and above the cables is the same as in the crossing area.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…If the 110 kV underground cable line is already installed in accordance with fig. 2(b), if the cable trench is completely filled with quartz sand, and if it is planned to coat the pavement surface with, for instance, a cool pavement seal that costs about 3.7 $/m 2 and lasts up to 7 years [3,21], the appropriate repayment period can be reliably estimated for an electricity transmission tariff of 0.36 $c/kWh [22]. According to [3,21], two coats of a seal coating could cost an estimated 4440 $ per kilometer length of the cable line route.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10. The three main methods of laying the UGC are direct laying, draw-in system and solid system [88]. The advantages of UGC are its smaller voltage drops and low chances of developing faults, which ensures noninterrupted continuity of supply.…”
Section: ) Underground Cablementioning
confidence: 99%