Optimism and Subjective Well-Being: Affectivity Plays a Secondary Role in the Relationship Between Optimism and Global Life Satisfaction in the Middle-Aged Women. Longitudinal and Cross-Cultural Findings

Abstract

The focus of the present study lies on optimism and its relationships to the components of subjective well-being, i.e. global life satisfaction, positive affect and negative affect. We investigated the direct and indirect (via affectivity) effects of optimism on global life satisfaction in the Swedish middleaged women at two time points (age 43 and 49), and in the Lithuanian middle-aged women. For this purpose, structural equation modelling was used and the fit indices were compared between two cognitive-affective models. The best fitting model suggests that the direct effect of optimism on global life satisfaction is stronger than that via affectivity. The result was found both in the Swedish sample at two time points and in the Lithuanian sample where the indirect effect was very low and insignificant. The indirect effect via negative affectivity was significant in the Swedish samples at both time points while the indirect effect via positive affectivity was low but significant only in the Swedish sample at age 43. In further analyses we studied the stability of optimism and the components of general SWB in the Swedish sample over a six-year period and a mean difference in optimism in two samples of women, Swedish and Lithuanian. Data analyses showed varying stability of the studied concepts with the highest stability coefficient being for negative affect and the lowest being for global life satisfaction. Cross-cultural analysis of mean difference in optimism showed that the Swedish women at age 43 reported significantly higher optimism as compared to their Lithuanian counterparts.

Associations of Self-Efficacy, Optimism, and Empathy with Psychological Health in Healthcare Volunteers

“…This study’s findings indicated that self-efficacy and optimism explained part of the variability of the participants’ psychological and subjective well-being and that empathy explained an incremental variability. Self-efficacy and optimism jointly explained a moderate-to-large portion of the variability in positive psychological functioning, in line with previous evidence of such a positive role in other populations [ 27 , 28 , 41 , 60 , 61 ].…”

Optimists report fewer physical and mental health conditions than pessimists in the general Norwegian population

“…Optimism is also associated with increased psychological well-being, fewer perceived stressors, a lower tendency to be depressed and problem-solving coping. Furthermore, optimism has been associated with higher scores in life satisfaction, positive effects, selfesteem, self-acceptance, positive relations with others, autonomy, environment mastery and personal growth (Bailey, Eng, Frisch, & Snyder, 2007;Chang, 2009;Daukantaite & Zukauskiene, 2012;Hart, Vella, & Mohr, 2008;Vacek, Coyle, & Vera, 2010). Optimism is also associated with the ability to find meaning after negative life events (Nolen-Hoecksema, 2000), and is not inevitably altered by changes in disease status .…”

Dimensions of life satisfaction: Immigrant and ethnic minorities

“…Human capital in terms of education and language skills, the latter being of special importance for immigrant and ethnic minorities, are also related to life satisfaction (Amit, ). Other factors which can positively affect life satisfaction are health conditions (Bartram, ; Knight & Gunatilaka, ) and optimism (Daukantait≐ & Zukauskiene, ). Mood may determine more than seventy percent of how much life satisfaction an individual reports (Seligman, ).…”