2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12046-019-1102-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization and analysis of exergy, economic, and environmental of a combined cycle power plant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This parameter indicates the difference between the average cost of products and fuel due to the destruction and cost of investment. In this relationship, c P, k and c F, k are respectively the average cost per unit exergy of product and fuel for the component k, and their values are obtained from Equations (12) and (13).…”
Section: Exergoeconomic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This parameter indicates the difference between the average cost of products and fuel due to the destruction and cost of investment. In this relationship, c P, k and c F, k are respectively the average cost per unit exergy of product and fuel for the component k, and their values are obtained from Equations (12) and (13).…”
Section: Exergoeconomic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 They also studied different types of desalination systems and their governing equations, then modeled the energy consumption of the evaporation vacuum evaporation system with a brine tank and reported on the economic analysis results. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] Ghaebi et al investigated the thermodynamic modeling (including energy and exergy analysis) and the exogeochemical study of a power and hydrogen generation system including an organic Rankine cycle and a proton exchange membrane electrolyzer driven by geothermal energy, with different operating fluids (R245fa, R114, R600, and R236fa) to compare their effects on the performance of the payment system and used EES software for this purpose. Their results showed that the operating fluid R245fa has the highest energy and exergy efficiency, which are 3.11% and 67.58%, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amount of CO 2 produced in the combustion chamber is due to the combustion reaction, which is associated with various properties, including the temperature of the adiabatic flame. The adiabatic flame temperature can be calculated from the following equation: Tpz=Aσαexp()βσ+λ2πx*θy*ξz* m˙CO2=44.01×x×()m˙fuelmfuel, where x is the molar ratio in Equation of carbon in the fuel and the molecular weight of the fuel. This simple equation estimates precisely the amount of CO 2 emissions in the complete combustion process.…”
Section: System Description and Modeling Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amount of CO 2 produced in the combustion chamber is due to the combustion reaction, which is associated with various properties, including the temperature of the adiabatic flame. The adiabatic flame temperature can be calculated from the following equation: [36][37][38][39]…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parkash et al [32] reported the simulation of 440 µm solid particulates size slurry in the range of 10 to 30 % (by volume) at Prandtl number, Pr -5.83. Hoseinzadeh et al [33]- [38] reported the heat transfer characteristics through porous fins with multiple phase change material and presented the exergy energy analysis of power plant. The effect of MHD nanofluid heat transfer in a baffled U shaped enclosure is studied by Ma et al [39] - [41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%