2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization and extraction of edible microbial polysaccharide from fresh coconut inflorescence sap: An alternative substrate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The absorption peak was located at 835.1 cm −1 and appeared in PAP1a, indicating the presence of the areca polysaccharide α-type glycosidic bond ( 35 , 36 ). The FTIR spectra of these five areca polysaccharides were similar to the corresponding coconut polysaccharides reported by Mummaleti et al, indicating that they had similar structures ( 22 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The absorption peak was located at 835.1 cm −1 and appeared in PAP1a, indicating the presence of the areca polysaccharide α-type glycosidic bond ( 35 , 36 ). The FTIR spectra of these five areca polysaccharides were similar to the corresponding coconut polysaccharides reported by Mummaleti et al, indicating that they had similar structures ( 22 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The molecular weight of various arecanut (Areca chu L.) polysaccharides may be different in the range of 10 4 -10 6 Da. The Mws of neutral and acidic polysaccharides were similar to coconut inflorescence polysaccharides obtained by Mummaleti et al (22).…”
Section: Extraction Purification and Fractionation Of Polysaccharidessupporting
confidence: 84%
“…As displayed, the F value of 39.34 and p value of <0.0001 indicated a highly significant model. The p value of lack of fit was 0.7268, which also suggested a fitted model [ 28 ]. Besides, statistical indicators, including R 2 , Adj R 2 , Pred R 2 , and CV values, were 0.9752, 0.9504, 0.8935, and 3.18, respectively, and the difference of Pred R 2 and Adj R 2 was less than 0.2 (0.0569), indicating a good correlation between actual and predicted values [ 29 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The variance analysis demonstrated that coefficients A , B , C , AC , BC , A 2 , B 2 , and C 2 were extremely significant ( p < 0.01), whereas the interaction effects of AB showed no significant difference on cCPP yields, which indicates that the variables A , B , C , AC , BC , A 2 , B 2 , and C 2 could significantly influence the extraction yields of cCPPs. As shown, the p < 0.0001 of this mode and the p = 0.7258 for the lack-of-fit value indicate insignificant effects of deviation and suggest a fitted model [ 32 ]. Besides, the difference of less than 0.2 between the Pred R 2 and Adj R 2 values also indicates a good correlation between the predicted and actual cCPP extraction yields [ 33 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%