Optimization for customized trajectories in cone beam computed tomography

Abstract

Purpose: We developed a target-based cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging framework for optimizing an unconstrained three dimensional (3D) source-detector trajectory by incorporating prior image information. Our main aim is to enable a CBCT system to provide topical information about the target using a limited angle noncircular scan orbit with a minimal number of projections. Such a customized trajectory should include enough information to sufficiently reconstruct a particular volume of interest (VOI) under kinematic constraints, which may result from the patient size or additional surgical or radiation therapy-related equipment. Methods: A patient-specific model from a prior diagnostic computed tomography (CT) volume is used as a digital phantom for CBCT trajectory simulations. Selection of the best projection views is accomplished through maximizing an objective function fed by the imaging quality provided by different x-ray positions on the digital phantom data. The final optimized trajectory includes a limited angular range and a minimal number of projections which can be applied to a C-arm device capable of general source-detector positioning. The performance of the proposed framework is investigated in experiments involving an in-house-built box phantom including spherical targets as well as an Alderson-Rando head phantom. In order to quantify the image quality of the reconstructed image, we use the average full-width-half-maximum (FWHM avg) for the spherical target and feature similarity index (FSIM), universal quality index (UQI), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for an anatomical target. Results: Our experiments based on both the box and head phantom showed that optimized trajectories could achieve a comparable image quality in the VOI with respect to the standard C-arm circular CBCT while using approximately one quarter of projections. We achieved a relative deviation <7% for FWHM avg between the reconstructed images from the optimized trajectories and the standard Carm CBCT for all spherical targets. Furthermore, for the anatomical target, the relative deviation of FSIM, UQI, and CNR between the reconstructed image related to the proposed trajectory and the standard C-arm circular CBCT was found to be 5.06%, 6.89%, and 8.64%, respectively. We also compared our proposed trajectories to circular trajectories with equivalent angular sampling as the optimized trajectories. Our results show that optimized trajectories can outperform simple partial

Considerations for Upright Particle Therapy Patient Positioning and Associated Image Guidance

“…The flexibility to rotate the patient instead of the imaging device for CBCT acquisition has already been explored in (60) and was recently taken into account for the design of the MARIE ™ proton therapy solution by Leo Cancer Care Ltd (8). If options for upright and supine positioning are foreseen, robotic CBCT systems should be able to provide the necessary flexibility, especially since they allow for non-co-planar image acquisition (61). CBCT may be a more practical solution for imaging at isocenter compared to vertical CT, not least with the recent boost in achievable CBCT image accuracy via iterative and machine learning based algorithms (7).…”

Selection and evaluation of spherical acquisition trajectories for industrial computed tomography

“…However, frequency bands and scaling can be arbitrarily selected, which led to some derived metrics like the subjective quality factor [98]. Two more complicated two-dimensional metrics one encounters occasionally are the Feature Similarity Index [99] and the Visual Information Fidelity [100], which was later extended for usage with Gaussian copula functions [101] and has been used for CT-related investigations [102].…”

3D printed patient-specific thorax phantom with realistic heterogenous bone radiopacity using filament printer technology

“…For instance, this is particularly important for verification of advanced image reconstruction techniques. Bony tissues are considered as highly attenuation structures, which significantly affect the contrast of structures which are in proximity to bones in the reconstructed 3D image [7] . Therefore, simplified phantoms with non-realistic radiation attenuation properties for bony structures can lead to an inaccurate verification of such image reconstruction algorithms.…”