2004
DOI: 10.1243/095765004322847080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization method for the design of axial hydraulic turbines

Abstract: Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is becoming an increasingly reliable tool for the design of water turbines. Using different CFD codes, it is possible to find out and compare criteria for classifying runner blade geometry regarding the strengths of their characteristics. The final decision of runner geometry, with demanding energetic and cavitation characteristics, always remains for the design engineer. To reach the final result, the engineer has to compare the flow analysis results of a great number of dif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The discharge factor variation in Francis turbine with speed is negligible but increases with guide vane opening while in case of Kaplan turbine it increases with increase in both speed and guide vane opening as seen in fig. 9(a) and 9(b) [1]. The hydraulic efficiency has parabolic variation for each guide vane with maximum efficiency at different speed factors as shown in fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The discharge factor variation in Francis turbine with speed is negligible but increases with guide vane opening while in case of Kaplan turbine it increases with increase in both speed and guide vane opening as seen in fig. 9(a) and 9(b) [1]. The hydraulic efficiency has parabolic variation for each guide vane with maximum efficiency at different speed factors as shown in fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Reaction turbines are classified as mixed flow (Francis turbine) and axial flow (Propeller Kaplan turbines). The Francis and propeller runners have fixed blades and Kaplan runner has adjustable blade [1]. Theses turbines are mounted horizontally or vertically depending on the operational requirements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have focused on optimization of runners for Kaplan, Francis, pump-turbine, and unidirectional bulb turbines with large capacity using the CFD (computational fluid dynamics) method coupled with optimization algorithms. Lipej [8] presented a multi-objective genetic algorithm for the design of axial runners. Within the optimization procedure, a special program has been developed, which makes it possible to start the optimization procedure with a relatively high level of efficiency and transforms prescribed genetic parameters to the runner geometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lipej [10] optimized the design of the runner blade to maximize the hydrodynamic performance of an axial hydraulic turbine by using a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm. Lee at al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%