2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10898-012-9946-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization methodology assessment for the inlet velocity profile of a hydraulic turbine draft tube: part I—computer optimization techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Chen's [35] multiobjects optimization strategy, the loss coefficient is chosen as an objective to optimize the structure of a Francis turbine draft tube. In the study by Galva'n [36], the loss coefficient of the draft tube is more sensitive to the pressure distribution of the draft tube inlet, which can better describe the velocity distribution of the draft tube inlet and the flow loss caused by the change of the draft tube inlet velocity. Therefore, the loss coefficient ζ is chosen as one of the objective functions of multiobjective optimization.…”
Section: Optimization Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Chen's [35] multiobjects optimization strategy, the loss coefficient is chosen as an objective to optimize the structure of a Francis turbine draft tube. In the study by Galva'n [36], the loss coefficient of the draft tube is more sensitive to the pressure distribution of the draft tube inlet, which can better describe the velocity distribution of the draft tube inlet and the flow loss caused by the change of the draft tube inlet velocity. Therefore, the loss coefficient ζ is chosen as one of the objective functions of multiobjective optimization.…”
Section: Optimization Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this task, the objective function to be maximized is the mean pressure recovery, since it applies where uniform axial flow pertains at the cone inlet. Then, the structure of the inlet velocity profiles is modified, Galván et al [12] demonstrated through a flow sensitivity study that the loss coefficient is the most appropriate objective function for an optimization process. Thus, the objective function to be maximized is presented in Eq.…”
Section: The Objective Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, the Reynolds Average Navier-Stokes and the κ − ε turbulence model equations were used to describe an incompressible, viscous, turbulent, and steady flow, [12]. The standard model has been shown to be economical, robust, and reasonably precise, but it gives poor results for complex fluxes with severe pressure…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The migration process is controlled by two major parameters which are the rate of migration and the interval of migration. A parametric study was made by [25] to start an optimization loop with a high chance of success avoiding extensive preliminary sensitivity analysis proving also to be well suited for solving highly nonlinear problems, like the present one.…”
Section: Optimization Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(5) and the mean pressure recovery factor Cp m in eq. (6) were tested to select the most appropriate objective function [25].…”
Section: Objective Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%