1989
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9429(1989)115:10(1401)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization Model for Water Distribution System Design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
85
0
4

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 196 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
85
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This definition has been used frequently in early literature as shown by Lansey & Mays (1989) who report that several optimisation models have been developed with cost minimisation as the single objective of water distribution system design.…”
Section: Water Distribution System Design and Optimisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This definition has been used frequently in early literature as shown by Lansey & Mays (1989) who report that several optimisation models have been developed with cost minimisation as the single objective of water distribution system design.…”
Section: Water Distribution System Design and Optimisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various researchers (Walski 1985;Goulter 1987;Walters 1988;Mays 1989a andGoulter 1992) have made comprehensive reviews on the traditional methods. Early research on the optimization of water distribution systems used a linear programming technique.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other traditional optimization techniques including direct search techniques, dynamic programming, integer programming, and enumerative methods were applied to the optimal design of a water distribution system. A detailed review was given by Lansey and Mays (1989a) on these traditional optimization techniques. Su et al (1987) integrated a generalized reduced gradient (GRG) technique with a hydraulic network solver KYPIPE.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The conversion of continuous solutions into discrete diameters can induce a loss of optimality and even a loss of feasibility. Readers interested in previous work regarding the split-pipe design and continuous diameter approaches are referred to Walski (1985) and Lansey and Mays (1989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%