Optimization models for the joint Power-Delay minimization problem in green wireless access networks

Abstract

In wireless access networks, one of the most recent challenges is reducing the power consumption of the network, while preserving the quality of service perceived by users. Hence, mobile operators are rethinking their network design by considering two objectives, namely, saving power and guaranteeing a satisfactory quality of service. Since these objectives are conflicting, a tradeoff becomes inevitable. We formulate a multi-objective optimization with aims of minimizing the network power consumption and transmission delay. Power saving is achieved by adjusting the operation mode of the network base stations from high transmit power levels to low transmit levels or even sleep mode. Minimizing the transmission delay is achieved by selecting the best user association with the network base stations. In this article, we cover two different technologies: IEEE 802.11 and LTE. Our formulation captures the specificity of each technology in terms of the power model and radio resource allocation. After exploring typical multi-objective approaches, we resort to a weighted sum mixed integer linear program. This enables us to efficiently tune the impact of the power and delay objectives.We provide extensive simulations for various preference settings that enable to assess the tradeoff between power and delay in IEEE 802.11 WLANs and LTE networks. We show that for a power minimization setting, a WLAN consumes up to 16% less power than legacy solutions. A thorough analysis of the optimization results reveals the impact of the network topology, particularly the inter-cell distance, on both objectives. For an LTE network, we assess the impact of urban, rural and realistic deployments on the achievable tradeoffs. The power savings mainly depend on user distribution and the power consumption of the sleep mode. Compared with legacy solutions, we obtained power savings of up to 22.3% in a realistic LTE networks. When adequately tuned, our optimization approach reduces the transmission delay by up to 6% in a WLAN and 8% in an LTE network.technological developments in the past years to meet capacity and Quality of Service (QoS) demands for User Equipment (UE). Pushed by the needs to reduce energy, mobile operators have recently been rethinking network design for optimizing energy efficiency and satisfying user QoS requirements.Currently, over 80% of the power in mobile telecommunications is consumed by the radio access network, more specifically at the base station (BS) level [4]. Hence, many research activities focus on improving the energy efficiency of wireless access networks. In the following, we give an overview of these activities and classify them according to different approaches that run at different timescales.Planning and deployment: The planning of energy-efficient wireless networks and the deployment of energyaware BSs deal with the problem of determining the positioning of BSs, the type (e.g., macro, micro, pico or femto) and the number of BSs needed to be deployed. In this context, we find that heterogeneous networks ha...

A Joint Power, Delay and Rate Optimization Model for Secondary Users in Cognitive Radio Sensor Networks

“…The answer to this question then gave birth to the many multi-objective optimization models that exist in the literature. A joint power and transmission delay optimization for green wireless access networks is developed in [ 18 , 19 ] as a bi-objective model. The problem is formulated as a mixed integer linear programming problem.…”

Cooperative Optimization for OFDMA Resource Allocation in Multi-RRH Millimeter-Wave CRAN

“…Meanwhile, another challenging issue is that high-speed wireless transmission is usually associated with large power consumption. As it is shown in [18], power consumed by wireless communication devices accounts for about 3% of entire electricity consumption worldwide, which is predicted to increase sharply in 5G cellular network. More power consumption would accelerate the greenhouse effect, which is considered as a major threat to human health and social development [19].…”