Optimization of a relativistic quantum mechanical engine

Abstract

We present an optimal analysis for a quantum mechanical engine working between two energy baths within the framework of relativistic quantum mechanics, adopting a first-order correction. This quantum mechanical engine, with the direct energy leakage between the energy baths, consists of two adiabatic and two isoenergetic processes and uses a three-level system of two noninteracting fermions as its working substance. Assuming that the potential wall moves at a finite speed, we derive the expression of power output and, in particular, reproduce the expression for the efficiency at maximum power.

Magnetic Engine for the Single-Particle Landau Problem

“…The last equation corresponds to the microscopic formulation of the first law of thermodynamics [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][25][26][27]31,34,35]. The first term in Equation (10) is associated with the energy exchange, while the second term represents the work done.…”

“…The possibility to create an alternative and efficient nanoscale device, like its macroscopic counterpart, introduces the concept of the quantum engine, which was proposed by Scovil and Schultz-Dubois in the 1950s [1]. The key point here is the quantum nature of the working substance and of course the quantum versions of the laws of thermodynamics [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. The combination of these two simple facts leads to very interesting studies of well-known macroscopic engines of thermodynamics, such as Carnot, Stirling and Otto, among others [2][3][4].…”

Magnetic Quantum Otto Engine for the Single-Particle Landau Problem

“…The first law of quantum thermodynamics is fully addressed in many works [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] and gives us the possibility to explore different quantum cycles and compare them with the classical analogues. To derivate this law simply, consider a Hamiltonian with an explicit dependence of some parameter that we will call µ in a generic form [25].…”

“…The possibility to create an alternative and efficient nanoscale device, like its macroscopic counterpart, introduces the concept of the quantum engine, which was proposed by Scovil and Schultz-Dubois in the 1950's [1]. The key point here is the quantum nature of the working substance and of course the quantum versions of the laws of thermodynamics [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. The combination of these two simple facts leads to very interesting studies of well-known macroscopic engines of thermodynamics, such as Carnot, Stirling and Otto, among others [2][3][4].…”

Magnetic Engine for the Single-Particle Landau Problem

“…The possibility to create an alternative and efficient nanoscale device, like its macroscopic counterpart, introduces the concept of the quantum engine, which was proposed by Scovil and Schultz-Dubois in the 1950's [1]. The key point here is the quantum nature of the working substance and of course the quantum versions of the laws of thermodynamics [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. The combination of these two simple facts leads to very interesting studies of well-known macroscopic engines of thermodynamics, such as Carnot, Stirling and Otto, among others [2][3][4].…”