2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11663-019-01698-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of CCT Equations Using Calculated Grain Boundary Soluble Compositions for the Simulation of Austenite Decomposition of Steels

Abstract: New CCT equations have been developed and optimized to simulate the start temperatures of the austenite decomposition process in low-alloyed steels using experimental CCT data published in the literature. Exceptionally, this optimization does not apply the nominal compositions of the steels, but the corresponding soluble compositions of the grain boundaries calculated using IDS software, depending on the reported austenitization treatments of the steels. These compositions, rather than the nominal ones, are ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, this heat source is described using q˙ =LdXidt where L is the latent heat of phase transformation at temperature Ti, dXi is the change of the volume fraction transformed in time increment dt . The kinetics of the isothermal austenite decomposition is frequently described by the Johnson‐Mehl‐Avrami‐Kolmogorov(JMAK) approach, that is, XXe=1exptrue(rtntrue) here, X e is the equilibrium or maximum fraction transformed for the considered transformation product and temperature, is a rate constant which depends on steel chemistry and temperature, and n is the JMAK exponent. This equation can typically be extended to non‐isothermal transformation that occurs on the ROT by using the additivity rule .…”
Section: Temperature Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, this heat source is described using q˙ =LdXidt where L is the latent heat of phase transformation at temperature Ti, dXi is the change of the volume fraction transformed in time increment dt . The kinetics of the isothermal austenite decomposition is frequently described by the Johnson‐Mehl‐Avrami‐Kolmogorov(JMAK) approach, that is, XXe=1exptrue(rtntrue) here, X e is the equilibrium or maximum fraction transformed for the considered transformation product and temperature, is a rate constant which depends on steel chemistry and temperature, and n is the JMAK exponent. This equation can typically be extended to non‐isothermal transformation that occurs on the ROT by using the additivity rule .…”
Section: Temperature Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also simulated, below the solidus, were the ferrite/austenite transformations and the solute microsegregation, including the determination of the soluble grain boundary compositions. As these compositions, instead of the nominal ones, are expected to control the start of austenite decomposition, [3] they will play an important role in a later study, in which we plan to extend the current simulation work on high-AlMnSi (Al ‡ 0.5 wt pct, Mn ‡ 2 wt pct, Si ‡ 1 wt pct) steels to their austenite decomposition process. These simulations will apply new continuous cooling transformation (CCT) equations, which take into account the Al alloying that was not considered in the previously optimized CCT equations of Miettinen et al [3] A. IDS Tool…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nonlinearity relationship between the heat treatment and the alloying elements is a known characteristic that specifies the interactions between the alloying elements. [36] This description was also confirmed in Reference 37 with the occurrence of concave regions signifying the interaction between alloying elements either enhancing or reducing each other's effects. This agrees with our results as Table IV further shows that the analysis of the interaction of C-Ni in ferrite transformation starts with the physical contribution of high hardenability.…”
Section: A Discussion Of the Interaction Of Alloying Elementsmentioning
confidence: 60%