2021
DOI: 10.1021/acsabm.1c00774
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of Cortisol-Selective Molecularly Imprinted Polymers Enabled by Molecular Dynamics Simulations

Abstract: Today, we heavily rely on technology and increasingly utilize it to monitor our own health. The identification of sensitive, accurate biosensors that are capable of real-time cortisol analysis is one important potential feature for these technologies to aid us in the maintenance of our physical and mental wellbeing. Detection and quantification of cortisol, a well-known stress biomarker present in sweat, offers a noninvasive and potentially real-time method for monitoring anxiety. Molecularly imprinted polymer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…65 Regardless of the limited control over the physical form of the obtained imprinted species, many MIP publications still employ the bulk polymerisation approach, possibly due to reproducibility and simplicity with respect to the preparation and formulation of this polymerisation process. 60,61,63,66 Bulk polymerisation limitations have led to the development of alternative approaches, including in situ prepared monoliths, molecularly imprinted monoliths, MIP membranes, and MIP beads. 22,[67][68][69][70][71] Precipitation polymerisation (Figure 2b) is credited to the processes improved heat control and direct preparation of large-scale production.…”
Section: Methodologies To Produce Molecularly Imprinted Polymers and ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…65 Regardless of the limited control over the physical form of the obtained imprinted species, many MIP publications still employ the bulk polymerisation approach, possibly due to reproducibility and simplicity with respect to the preparation and formulation of this polymerisation process. 60,61,63,66 Bulk polymerisation limitations have led to the development of alternative approaches, including in situ prepared monoliths, molecularly imprinted monoliths, MIP membranes, and MIP beads. 22,[67][68][69][70][71] Precipitation polymerisation (Figure 2b) is credited to the processes improved heat control and direct preparation of large-scale production.…”
Section: Methodologies To Produce Molecularly Imprinted Polymers and ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Capitalising on our previous work on modelling MIP systems, 36–39 in this work, the pre-polymerisation mixture for a FLX-MIP is simulated using MD. Methacrylic acid (MAA), itaconic acid (IA), 2 (hydroxyethyl)methacrylate (HEMA), acrylamide (ACA) and acrylonitrile (ACN) were selected as FM candidates.…”
Section: Computational Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Klangphukhiew et al carried out the polymerization process by placing the pre-polymerization solution into a nitrogen furnace at a temperature of 70 °C for 24 h [ 55 ]. Incorporating nitrogen gas into the pre-polymerization process [ 9 , 48 , 56 , 57 , 58 ], or during the polymerization process [ 55 , 59 , 60 ], has been applied to the bulk imprinting method. It works as a degassing or purging agent to remove dissolved oxygen and eliminate compounds with low molecular weights that can potentially cause the constructed polymer to return to the monomer form [ 61 , 62 ].…”
Section: Molecularly Imprinted Polymermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By manipulating the non-covalent interactions between monomers, molecular templates, cross-linkers, and solvents, MIPs can produce a polymer chain with pockets or cavities with shapes and functional groups corresponding to the template molecule. In this case, cortisol is used as the template molecule [ 9 ]. The MIP that has been formed will undergo a molecular template removal process to eliminate all the remaining cortisol for the rebinding process with cortisol in the actual sample [ 3 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%