2019
DOI: 10.1080/01691864.2019.1698462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of criterion for objective evaluation of HRI performance that approximates subjective evaluation: a case study in robot competition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results obtained indicate that the subjective evaluation result was significantly influenced by the distance traveled by the test subjects and the changes in the gaze directions of the test subjects (Mizuchi and Inamura, 2020). The coefficient for the explanatory variable any_inst has a large value, which is a variable indicating whether or not the robot generated instructions, corresponding to the software bug that interrupted the robot behavior.…”
Section: Modeling Of Subjective Evaluation Of Hri Qualitymentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results obtained indicate that the subjective evaluation result was significantly influenced by the distance traveled by the test subjects and the changes in the gaze directions of the test subjects (Mizuchi and Inamura, 2020). The coefficient for the explanatory variable any_inst has a large value, which is a variable indicating whether or not the robot generated instructions, corresponding to the software bug that interrupted the robot behavior.…”
Section: Modeling Of Subjective Evaluation Of Hri Qualitymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Although the best evaluation method involves asking several referees to score the performance in several trials, human navigation was evaluated by a certain regulation, such as a positive point for "desirable behavior" and a negative point for "unfriendly behavior," which is described in the rulebook from a subjective viewpoint. We have addressed this challenge to determine the dominant factor for the evaluation of the interaction behavior in the HRI dataset (Mizuchi and Inamura, 2020). The approach is to have a third party evaluate the quality of human-robot interaction, and model the relationship between the subjective evaluation points and the physical and social behaviors of humans and robots.…”
Section: Modeling Of Subjective Evaluation Of Hri Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, we first investigate (RQ1:) whether pre-training robot behaviours with crowd-sourced data improves robo-waiter perceptions as compared to a 'control' condition with randomly sampled, static robot behaviours. Recent works have also highlighted the importance of using objective feedback in HRI evaluation, arguing that the timeconsuming nature of subjective feedback (via questionnaires) makes it less likely to be effective in longitudinal learning settings such as with HSRs [43]. Thus, we employ an objective evaluation strategy, via explicit (using speech) and implicit (using facial expressions) feedback given by the participants during their interactions with the HSR.…”
Section: Research Questions and Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, if the robot's instructions are insufficient/inaccurate, the subject wanders around and makes mistakes in the task. The subjects' response is evaluated to determine if the robot's guidance is accurate, efficient, friendly, and easily understood by the subjects [6].…”
Section: Hri In a Robot Competitionmentioning
confidence: 99%