2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2013.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of cryoprotectant loading into murine and human oocytes

Abstract: Loading of cryoprotectants into oocytes is an important step of the cryopreservation process, in which the cells are exposed to potentially damaging osmotic stresses and chemical toxicity. Thus, we investigated the use of physics-based mathematical optimization to guide design of cryoprotectant loading methods for mouse and human oocytes. We first examined loading of 1.5 M dimethylsulfoxide (Me2SO) into mouse oocytes at 23°C. Conventional one-step loading resulted in rates of fertilization (34%) and embryonic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, a surfactant or chemical additive that is capable of reducing the surface tension without cytotoxicity is required for stable evolution of spherical droplets as well as for long‐term cell viability. We selected dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) as a biocompatible surface tension modifier as this reagent is commonly used as a cryoprotectant additive (CPA) and as an agent to induce differentiation of cultured cells . Various concentrations of DMSO (0, 5, and 10 vol%) were added to the bioink that was then jetted using the same jetting conditions to determine the optimal DMSO concentration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a surfactant or chemical additive that is capable of reducing the surface tension without cytotoxicity is required for stable evolution of spherical droplets as well as for long‐term cell viability. We selected dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) as a biocompatible surface tension modifier as this reagent is commonly used as a cryoprotectant additive (CPA) and as an agent to induce differentiation of cultured cells . Various concentrations of DMSO (0, 5, and 10 vol%) were added to the bioink that was then jetted using the same jetting conditions to determine the optimal DMSO concentration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While not complete in their description of the processes, the predictions of these models have been extremely useful in guiding experimental design, demonstrating feasibility of approaches, etc. [11,12,20,36,44,[48][49][50]69,78,84,122]. Many advances in computational complexity, transport and solution theories [10,28,32,57,97], as well as experimental parameter identification techniques [24][25][26]58,116,117] have been made along the way, facilitating more accurate models and better predictions of intracellular ice formation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Each step can induce damage to cells. Osmotic shock occurring during loading and unloading of CPA is one of the major causes of cell damage during the cryopreservation process [63, 64]. A microfluidic approach to minimize osmotic shock to cells during cryopreservation has been introduced by Song and colleagues [11].…”
Section: The Use Of Microfluidic Technologies For Cell Preservation Pmentioning
confidence: 99%