2015
DOI: 10.1007/s12541-015-0198-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of flatness of strip during coiling process based on evolutionary algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This kind of directional mutation has the same concept of the well-known opposition based method presented for improving the DE performance in the literature [22,23]. This rule guarantees that the differential variation is oriented toward a better vector, thus increasing the possibility of creating an improved solution.…”
Section: Modification In Mutation: the Random Directional Mutationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This kind of directional mutation has the same concept of the well-known opposition based method presented for improving the DE performance in the literature [22,23]. This rule guarantees that the differential variation is oriented toward a better vector, thus increasing the possibility of creating an improved solution.…”
Section: Modification In Mutation: the Random Directional Mutationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimisation of a strip coiling process using mate-heuristic Up to recently, we have studied using a number of meta-heuristics in solving the optimum strip coiling process posed to alleviate the strip wavy edges during coiling. The optimisers include differential evolution (DE) [3], simulated annealing (SA) [4], artificial bee colony optimisation (ABC) [5], teaching-learning based optimisation (TLBO) [6], real code ant colony optimisation (ACOR) [7], league championship algorithm (LCA) [8], Opposition-based Differential Evolution Algorithm (OPDE) [9], charged system search (ChSS) [10], Enhanced teaching-learning based optimisation with differential evolution (ETLBO-DE) [2] and improved teaching-learning based algorithm (ITLBO) [11]. They were used to solve the problem for five optimisation runs with a population size of 100 and the number of iterations being 100 (100100 function evaluations).…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4] The coiling process, as the last step of the production line, also affects the final performance of the product. 5,6) The stress state inside the coil directly determines whether defects will occur, such as surface quality damage caused by sliding between adjacent layers, collapse after unloading, and plastic deformation of the inner layers and sleeve caused by excessive radial stress. [7][8][9][10] However, it is difficult to measure the internal stress state during the coiling process through experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%