2017
DOI: 10.1080/23311916.2017.1335444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of machine downtime in the plastic manufacturing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some case studies have proved that successfully implementing TPM brings out invaluable impacts to the overall performance of the organization or a company. TPM has shown significant improvements of the ranges 30-40% improvement in Overall Equipment Effectiveness, a 45% improvement in manufacturing output, 55-75% reduction in accidents as well as 70-80% reduction in defects & rework, 15% reduction in power costs as well as 75% reduction in breakdowns, downtimes [31][32][33].…”
Section: Iv1 Tpm Implementation Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some case studies have proved that successfully implementing TPM brings out invaluable impacts to the overall performance of the organization or a company. TPM has shown significant improvements of the ranges 30-40% improvement in Overall Equipment Effectiveness, a 45% improvement in manufacturing output, 55-75% reduction in accidents as well as 70-80% reduction in defects & rework, 15% reduction in power costs as well as 75% reduction in breakdowns, downtimes [31][32][33].…”
Section: Iv1 Tpm Implementation Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, a low availability of the machines is identified by stops and technical failures that generate waste in the different processes involved in the operation of the machine [4]. On the other hand, it is considered important to reduce the downtime of a machine that is preceded by a shutdown, which has a considerable effect on improving productivity and decreases negative impacts such as waste generation [24].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modern manufacturing systems consist of advanced engineering schemes with elevated technology that ought to operate for 24 h in a day, 7 days in a week and 365 days in a year (Gupta et al, 1988;Windmark et al (2012); Peng and Zhu, 2017;Tsarouhas and Besseris, 2017). By emphasising the significance of bottleneck machines in production lines, authors have called for more attention to the mean downtime per year of equipment in engineered systems (see also Fuerst et al, 1991;Fox et al, 2008;Al-Chalabi et al, 2014;Koussaimi et al, 2016;Ossai et al, 2016;Nwanya et al, 2017). As noted by Windmark et al (2012), manufacturing downtime in cells, production lines or sole machines exhibit complicated features in statistical behaviour and should be studied for their frequency and duration of the display.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%