2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of machining parameters for surface roughness during abrasive water jet machining of aluminium/magnesium hybrid metal matrix composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ANN and the regression model were used for surface roughness prediction in the AWJ cutting of AA 7075 aluminum alloy [ 9 ]. Additionally, different approaches have been applied for the investigation of surface roughness in the AWJ process, such as fuzzy logic in [ 10 ], the Taguchi-based analysis of variance method in [ 11 , 12 , 13 ], the multi-objective genetic algorithm (MOGA) in [ 14 ], and the regression method in [ 10 , 15 ]. Liu et al [ 16 ] developed quadratic regression models to predict the penetration depth and surface roughness in abrasive water jet turning of alumina ceramics using a response surface methodology with a Box–Behnken design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ANN and the regression model were used for surface roughness prediction in the AWJ cutting of AA 7075 aluminum alloy [ 9 ]. Additionally, different approaches have been applied for the investigation of surface roughness in the AWJ process, such as fuzzy logic in [ 10 ], the Taguchi-based analysis of variance method in [ 11 , 12 , 13 ], the multi-objective genetic algorithm (MOGA) in [ 14 ], and the regression method in [ 10 , 15 ]. Liu et al [ 16 ] developed quadratic regression models to predict the penetration depth and surface roughness in abrasive water jet turning of alumina ceramics using a response surface methodology with a Box–Behnken design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu et al [ 16 ] developed quadratic regression models to predict the penetration depth and surface roughness in abrasive water jet turning of alumina ceramics using a response surface methodology with a Box–Behnken design. Different kinds of materials were subjected to the AWJ process, among them, carbon steel S235 [ 14 ], Hardox steel [ 15 ], magnesium alloy [ 10 ], aluminum alloy [ 17 , 18 ], titanium alloy [ 19 ], marble [ 20 ], aluminum/magnesium hybrid metal matrix composites [ 11 ], a lanthanum phosphate/yttria composite [ 12 ], and Nimonic C236 superalloy [ 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically jewels are created from ruby, diamond, or sapphire, a "jewel" mounted in a steel insert. Its diameter ranges from 0.007" to 0.020" (0.178 -0.51) mm [16], notice figure 3. Secondary nozzle Sometimes refers to as mixing tube or Focusing tube.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a tube manufactured from a tough material that concentrates the water and abrasive into a coherent beam for cutting. Typically, a mixing tube has a diameter of 0.030″ (0.76 mm) [16], notice figure 3, to the abrasive water jet nozzle to cut efficiently and improve the life of components . The jewel orifice must be accurately aligned in the nozzle body.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kale et al [ 28 ] investigated the material removal rate and surface roughness with the Taguchi and grey-relational analysis and combined it with analysis of variance (ANOVA) to determine the effect changing parameters on the analysed factors. The same method, Taguchi (ANOVA), was used by Maneiah et al, who examined metal matrix composites (MMCs) of Al-6061 [ 29 ]. Fuzzy logic and regression equations have also been employed to predict surface roughness in a number of studies, including the analysis of the abrasive waterjet machining of AZ91 magnesium alloy involving response surface methodology (RSM) [ 30 ].…”
Section: Introduction—state Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%