2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.04.093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of NiFe 2 O 4 /rGO composite electrode for lithium-ion batteries

Abstract: A NiFe2O4/rGO composite wasfabricated via a hydrothermal-annealing method, in which the mean size of spinel NiFe2O4 nanoparticles was around 20 nm. The optimized NiFe2O4/rGO electrode with CMC binder exhibited high reversible capacity, good cycling durability and high-rate capability, whereas the electrode with PVDF binder underwent rapid capacity decay. (a) (b)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…107 A more stable cycling behaviour has been reported for CoFe 2 O 4 electrodes, prepared using alginate rather than PVdF, as a result of the formation of H-bonds as detected via FTIR (Fouriertransform infrared spectroscopy). 108 Similarly, Fe 3 O 4 electrodes made with PAA 109 and NiFe 2 O 4 anodes including arabic gum 110 or CMC 111 outperformed those prepared with PVdF. Aqueous based formulations with a CMC binder were also employed for carbon-coated ZnFe 2 O 4 anodes, and investigated both in half- 112 and full lithium-ion cells with an LiFePO 4 cathode (also including CMC).…”
Section: View Article Onlinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…107 A more stable cycling behaviour has been reported for CoFe 2 O 4 electrodes, prepared using alginate rather than PVdF, as a result of the formation of H-bonds as detected via FTIR (Fouriertransform infrared spectroscopy). 108 Similarly, Fe 3 O 4 electrodes made with PAA 109 and NiFe 2 O 4 anodes including arabic gum 110 or CMC 111 outperformed those prepared with PVdF. Aqueous based formulations with a CMC binder were also employed for carbon-coated ZnFe 2 O 4 anodes, and investigated both in half- 112 and full lithium-ion cells with an LiFePO 4 cathode (also including CMC).…”
Section: View Article Onlinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apparently, the S-NFO shows high capacity retention of 92 % after 130 cycles at various current densities (from 1.0 to 20 A g −1 ). Such excellent rate performance outperforms not only P-NFO and L-NFO, but also compete with other NiFe 2 O 4 or NiO electrodes (Park et al, 2015; Yu et al, 2015; Li C. et al, 2017) and some other TMOs/MTMOs hybrids (Zou et al, 2014; Hou L. et al, 2015; Yuan et al, 2015). Detailed rate capability comparison of this S-NFO with other NiFe 2 O 4 and NiO based electrodes is illustrated in Figure 3F.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…However, the obtained surface area for our composite material is impressive and surpasses some of the previously reported literature data such as those of the NF/GC composite (43.6 m 2 g À1 ), NF/RGO composite (57.3 m 2 g À1 ), NF/rGO composite (78.4 m 2 g À1 ), NF/GNS composite (92.18 m 2 g À1 ), and NF/MoS 2 composite (45.8 m 2 g À1 ). 20,[29][30][31][32] The obtained pore volume and pore diameter for the 10 PGNF composite is 0.2 cm 3 g À1 and 3.5 nm, respectively.…”
Section: Bet Surface Area Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%