2022
DOI: 10.32933/actainnovations.43.5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of process parameters in turning of magnesium AZ91D alloy for better surface finish using genetic algorithm

Abstract: This research examined at the optimum cutting parameters for producing minimum surface roughness and maximum Material Removal Rate (MRR) when turning magnesium alloy AZ91D. Cutting speed (m/min), feed (mm/rev), and cut depth (mm) have all been considered in the experimental study. To find the best cutting parameters, Taguchi's technique and Response Surface Methodology (RSM), an evolutionary optimization techniques Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm-II (NSGA-II) were employed. G… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In effect, this parameter is an absolute measure, which means that it does not take into account whether a given profile has valleys or peaks. Despite its shortcomings, this parameter is very useful for evaluating the stability and control of a technological process [6] to [7]. Another commonly studied surface roughness parameter is the total height of the roughness profile Rt, which is determined between the largest profile peak height and the largest profile valley depth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In effect, this parameter is an absolute measure, which means that it does not take into account whether a given profile has valleys or peaks. Despite its shortcomings, this parameter is very useful for evaluating the stability and control of a technological process [6] to [7]. Another commonly studied surface roughness parameter is the total height of the roughness profile Rt, which is determined between the largest profile peak height and the largest profile valley depth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%