1996
DOI: 10.1109/68.536640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of pump and signal powers for wavelength converters based on FWM in semiconductor optical amplifiers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
10
0
3

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
10
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to Summerfield and Tucker [21], we have found that operating at a P/Q ratio of 3 dB is not optimal. The converter shows relatively flat, consistent performance for P/Q ratios ranging from about 5-15 dB or equivalently a dynamic input power range of about 10 dB.…”
Section: Pump-to-probe Ratiosupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar to Summerfield and Tucker [21], we have found that operating at a P/Q ratio of 3 dB is not optimal. The converter shows relatively flat, consistent performance for P/Q ratios ranging from about 5-15 dB or equivalently a dynamic input power range of about 10 dB.…”
Section: Pump-to-probe Ratiosupporting
confidence: 55%
“…However, it has previously been shown that this ratio is not optimal for the case of a modulated input signal [21]. Modulating a high percentage of the input power to the SOA can induce modulation of the SOA gain and cause ISI.…”
Section: Pump-to-probe Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early studies of the nature of FWM in semiconductor traveling wave amplifiers has pointed out that the most dominant source of FWM in SOAs is the creation of gain and index gratings through the periodic modulation of the injected carriers in the device by the traveling pump and probe waves (Agrawal, 1987). Early demonstrations of wavelength conversion based on degenerate FWM in SOAs, date to the early 90', and were dedicated to the methodical characterization of the convertors in terms of conversion penalty and equivalent noise figure (Mecozzi et al, 1995;Summerfield & Tucker, 1996). In order to reduce the conversion penalty as well as lower the effective noise figure of the convertors, power levels of pump and probe signals was set so that the SOA was deeply saturated.…”
Section: Four Wave Mixing Based Wavelength Convertorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the low-input power regime, the power margin drops because of insufficient optical SNR's on the converted signals, while on the highpower end, the margin is reduced because the laser oscillation is partially quenched and, therefore, the pump power is lower. Notice that the nature of this degradation at high input power is expected to be fundamentally different from that of a nonlasing wavelength converter [13]. In particular, the value of the gain is clamped at the threshold value in the self-pumped device whereas it experiences saturation in a conventional nonlasing converter.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%